The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Operator: Javadyou (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 18:36, Tuesday April 10, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised Automatic

Programming language(s): python

Source code available: Standard pywikipedia

Function overview: Interwiki

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Continuous

Estimated number of pages affected: 100 page per day

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): N Y

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Y N

Function details: add and changes interwikies

Discussion[edit]

Javadyou (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What namespaces will you edit and what interwiki.py options will you use? Why is the bot non-exclusion compliant? Does "supervised" mean you will check every edit? Make sure you read WP:INTERWIKIBOT. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 19:23, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Thanks for your respose.I will edit articles and categories.I use -array , -number , -cleanup and -async options.The "supervised" is my mistake and "Automatic" is true.Best Regards Javadyou (talk) 21:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Will you only edit to fa: wiki or other wikis as well? If so, make sure -cleanup option does not break on sr: wiki and similar. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 21:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I want to edit not only in fa:wiki.Ok, I dont use -cleanup option. Regard Javadyou (talk) 23:43, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 07:46, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Trial complete. Done, Best Regards. Javadyou (talk) 03:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Is an edit to template [1] a mistake? This [2] edit is wrong. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 08:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
about this edit ,this is my first edit ,and my mistake for edit on template namespaces,but the other edits is only in articles and categories.the edit 2 is true,and I dont find any mistake on it.Best Regards Javadyou (talk) 09:54, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The edit to Metal Gear Solid (Game Boy) was not correct. Also, your bot is still editing. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 08:08, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
About The edit to Metal Gear Solid (Game Boy), your say is true and this edit is incorrect,the edit is wrong because a person add an wrong interwiki into fa.wiki,that has Caused my Bot edit wrongly.I stop My Bot from editing in en.wiki and waiting for flag.Thanks and kind Regards.Javadyou (talk) 10:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You have explained how the dud edit happened, but not why it wasn't caught and why it will be caught in the future. Josh Parris 00:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This wrong edit happens, because a wrong interwiki on other wikis.but these wrong edits dont stay in en.wiki,because my Bot or another Bot correct it when wrong interwikis in other wikis changed to a correct interwiki.However I Promise and try to check my Bot edits in en.wiki in future if give me flag in this wiki.Best RegardJavadyou (talk) 14:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
My python version was old, I update it now to versin 2.7.2 ,as you know this version does not have bug ,and now it dont make wrong edits,I can do test edits with this new version , if you want.Regards Javadyou (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Ok, another trial. MBisanz talk 21:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Trial complete. Done.I make 50 new test edits. Best Regards.Javadyou (talk) 23:30, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I run interwiki Bot from my computer ,and I dont run it from toolserver.Regards Javad YousefiTalk 17:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Approved. MBisanz talk 16:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.