The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:38, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Contains only one link, so that should be in the parent category. Radiant_* 09:09, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:38, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Contains only one article, and a link to a subcat already referenced in that article. Move to parent category, imho. Radiant_* 09:09, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) --Kbdank71 14:41, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto but only two links. This seems too narrow for a category, maybe a subsection in 'deletion policy' is in order. Radiant_* 09:09, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:41, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
What in the world does this even mean? -- Curps 05:25, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:57, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No potential for growth, plant genus that has only one species: Argyreia nervosa, which was moved to the Convolvulaceae family category instead. --Aramգուտանգ 04:53, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 16:57, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This just seems to convoluted to be useful. People can already get a list of the languages that Wikipedia is available in, and they can already get a list of articles on particular languages. It is also empty at the moment. -- Beland 01:46, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 17:05, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Voting results:
"Delete" (6): Postdlf, cesarb, Deco, Radiant, Kbdank71, Askar
"Keep" (2): Adraeus, SchmuckyTheCat
Consensus is to delete
POV and just asking for trouble. Judging from the category description, a more apt title might be "articles that wikipedians most tend to fight over," which may or may not relate to whether the subject matter is in fact controversial, just whether or not there is agreement on how to describe it. I can't see how this can function to do anything but disparage a topic as of dubious veracity or morality and help to further edit wars by carving in stone the notion that no consensus will be reached in disagreements. Delete. Postdlf 00:02, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)