The result of the debate was delete iff template is deleted --Kbdank71 15:58, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Articles cannot be legally moved to Wikitravel. Thus, nothing can ever be put in the category. -- Cyrius|✎ 22:00, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:21, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Empty duplicate of existing category Category:United States Department of Defense -Etoile 21:12, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename Category:U.S. Dept. of Defense agencies --Kbdank71 15:27, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Duplicate of existing category Category:U.S. Dept. of Defense agencies which is in line with other relevant dept. categories -Etoile 21:12, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 15:28, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Rename to Category:History by country like the rest of the subcategories of Category:Categories by country. Neutralitytalk 19:14, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 15:29, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
For the subcategories of Category:History by nation; more logical. Neutralitytalk 19:14, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was merge --Kbdank71 15:55, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
These ought to be merged together into category:locomotives by wheel arrangement as this is an artificial classification; in en: Whyte system is used for steam and diesel shunters, UIC for modern diesel/electrics; but the UIC system can be applied to all locomotives, and would be used in fr: and de, so reading into this you create the possibility of duplicate articles on C and 0-6-0, say. Did anyone understand that? Dunc|☺ 18:43, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) --Kbdank71 15:38, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
A similar case to category:Cantonese terms nominated below. I am nominating this to facilitate a discussion among contributers. — Instantnood 14:55, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:53, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This category was previously marked as ((db)) for "ridiculous category as he is not dead. Can be created when it becomes a relevant question". But since that is not a criterion for speedy, I'm listing it here. I abstain. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 14:40, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) --Kbdank71 15:39, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
An impossibly broad category, with the only thing in common between entries being language. Its mother categories, Category:Terminology and Category:Chinese language, does not have a single subcategory based on language. If we accept this, do we condone the creation of Category:English terms?--Huaiwei 14:37, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:51, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This goes in with the whole Wikipedia:Babel template implementation. la-N is reserved for Native speakers of Latin. Although, worldwide, there are probably half a billion people who know Latin at some level, I very much doubt we'll be able to find a Native speaker of it. ℬastique▼talk 14:03, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:52, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The same goes for Englisc, aka Old English, aka Anglo-Saxon ℬastique▼talk
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:41, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Misnomer, since there were four Iraq wars in history. Also, redundant with Category:2003 Iraq conflict. Thus, delete. Radiant_>|< 09:42, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:46, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This category is under Category:Animated television series and Category:Children's television series. Reasons for deletion and recat'ing the articles/subs.
So I propose we delete Category:Animated children's television series, and move all the articles and subs to its parent, Category:Animated television series.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:45, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I am completing an improperly nominated CfD on behalf of User:Ariele who wrote on the Category talk:Iraq War people page: Redundant, but if a KEEPER this Category is incomplete.
I, myself, abstain. DoubleBlue (Talk) 06:37, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- <>Who?¿? 04:28, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 15:42, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Rename this category to Category:Eastern Orthodox Patriarchs of Jerusalem to fit in with the main category of Christianity's Category:Eastern Orthodoxy. And, so as NOT to be confused with Judaism's Category:Orthodox Judaism. IZAK 06:18, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 15:42, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Rename this category to Category:Eastern Orthodox Icons to fit in with the main category of Christianity's Category:Eastern Orthodoxy. And, so as NOT to be confused with Judaism's Category:Orthodox Judaism. IZAK 06:04, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)