The result of the debate was keep. —akghetto talk 06:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Only two subcategories User kon (see below) and User xul. Omniplex 23:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. —akghetto talk 06:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Only one user. Omniplex 23:25, 26 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
See also separate TFD. Omniplex 00:31, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep. —akghetto talk 06:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think the word "hacker" is hopelessly equivocal. The equivocation is apparent in the mixture of articles so categorized, e.g. Gerald Sussman in the same category as '0x80'. I don't think a word that means so many different things to different people can provide a meaningful basis for classification. I listed this category in particular because of all the "Hacker" categories, it most conflates the word's various connotations, however I also support deleting the parent category. Moe Aboulkheir 23:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus. Syrthiss 21:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This recently-created category appears to duplicate an existing one. - EurekaLott 17:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. —akghetto talk 06:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicates Category:Native American tribes and Category:Native American people. JonHarder 14:47, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. —akghetto talk 06:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how this can be made other than POV. -choster 07:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no objective criteria as to what is in and what is out; also "Movies about [Roman]Catholicism" as suggested above is not better: The Passion of the Christ is out (no Roman Catholicism there, just a story common to all Christianity), but Keeping the Faith where half the jokes are directed at the protagonist (who is a Roman Catholic priest) is in. Not useful. Carlossuarez46 19:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename as listed...well, rename those not listed per list. --Syrthiss 21:24, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Subcategories of Category:Sports in the United States by city were recently renamed from Cityname sports to Sports in Cityname as the result of a recent CFR discussion. However, state names were added to all of the categories without consensus. I'm proposing removing the state names from all the categories, except the following:
- EurekaLott 06:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. —akghetto talk 05:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity category, not needed, and added by a vandal trying to humorize Wikipedia, where it is not needed. Category below is also created by same user, Jyoder63. I know and go to school with this user, and he needs to get it across that Wikipedia and Uncyclopedia are not one in the same. Эйрон Кинни 05:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy delete as redundant with Category:Wikipedians. — Feb. 26, '06 [07:37] <freakofnurxture|talk>
One User:space entry, and as its talk page states, everyone qualifies for this category, thus leaving no logical use for it xaosflux Talk/CVU 05:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. —akghetto talk 05:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant and empty since it was shown that category was misnamed, and has been supplanted by Category:Pederastic heroes and deities. (By the way, I am sorry to have jumped the gun - after depopulating the category I noticed that it is recommended to not do that - I am still learning the ropes here.) Haiduc 04:18, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. —akghetto talk 05:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicate of Category:Docklands Light Railway stations I just created because I'd failed to notice the former. OwenBlacker 03:34, 26 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy deleted as empty category. xaosflux Talk/CVU 05:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Duplicates Category:Fictional objects; category appears unused. JonHarder 00:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]