This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions[edit]

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' copyright violations in CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

Text

  • Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place ((subst:CCI|name=Contributor name)) on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place ((subst:cclean)) on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with ((subst:copyvio)), linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place ((subst:copyvio|url=see talk)) on the article's face and ((subst:CCId|name=Contributor name)) on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether problem was found (add ((y))) or not (add ((n))). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the ((y)).
  • Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)

Background[edit]

 Premkudva

"Here, everyone enjoys the generous hospitality without any distinction of caste, creed or class whatsoever ... The average flow of pilgrims is about 10,000 people everyday. ... Advanced mechanized and clean kitchen provides free food for all pilgrims at the Annapoorna Choultry..."

Premkudva adds to Wikipedia:

"Everyone enjoys the generous hospitality without any distinction of caste, creed or class whatsoever. On an average the flow of pilgrims is about 10,000 people everyday. A mechanised and clean kitchen provides free food for all pilgrims can feel comfortable at the guest houses..."

Source cited by Premkudva says:

"Hearing about the arrival of two saints the king came to meet them. Introducing himself as the king of Tulunadu he paid them his respects and offered them help and patronage. Pleased with the humility and virtues of the king they brought to his knowledge that his kingdom was a hallowed place and it was sanctified by the activities of holy saints and sages in the past. They requested him to grant them land so that they could build their hermitage and make it a centre of their religious activities under his protection and patronage."

Premkudva adds to Wikipedia:

"Hearing about the arrival of the two saints the King came to meet them. Introducing himself as the King of Tulunadu he paid his respects and offered them patronage. Pleased with the humility and virtues of the King they brought to his knowledge that his kingdom needed to be sanctified. They requested him to grant them land so that they could build a hermitage and make it a centre for their religous activities under his protection and patronage."

Source cited by Premkudva says:

"The temple is a neat and middle sized structure, the main building being a homogeneous one and the whole treatment square with the Mukhamantapa. The temple, as the inscription indicates may have been built in the 10th – 11th century AD, as evidenced by the installation of the Lokeshwara statue in the AD 968. The Balipitha in front of the temple also gives us an almost definite period going back to 10th century AD."

Premkudva adds to Wikipedia:

"The temple is a neat and middle sized structure with a pyramid shaped roof. The temple, as the inscription indicates may have been built in the 10th – 11th century AD, as evidenced by the installation of the Lokeshwara statue in the AD 968. The Balipitha in front of the temple also gives us an almost definite period going back to 10th century AD."

Source cited by Premkudva says:

"The kid, now eight and dyslexic, has since been living near Mont Blanc with his mum's dad, a kindly and supportive tram conductor."

Premkudva adds to Wikipedia:

"Tom who is eight and dyslexic, has since been living near Mont Blanc with his maternal grandfather, a tram conductor."

Source cited by Premkudva says:

"On March' 1824 the foundation of 3rd Calcutta Mint was laid on the Strand Road and was opened for production from 1st August' 1829. Before 1835 all the coins issued from this mint are also in the name of Murshidabad Mint."

Premkudva adds to Wikipedia:

"In March 1824 the foundation of third Calcutta Mint was laid on Strand Road and was opened for production from 1 August 1829. Until 1835 the coins issued at this mint continued to be in the name of the Murshidabad Mint."

Notes: Many of these instances of WP:COPYPASTE or close paraphrasing are very very old (more than five years). More recent article creations by Premkudva (e.g. [1]) show use of appropriate cited short quotations and other material apparently properly paraphrased. However, there does not seem yet to have been any concerted effort to deal with the substantial quantity of material created earlier. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • I thought about cutting this off at the end of 2010, but the recent copyright warning on the user's talk page and the additional workload (50 articles between 2011 and now) suggest otherwise. MER-C 06:27, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Contribution survey[edit]

Premkudva (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

This report covers contributions to 335 articles from timestamp 2005-09-15 09:29:18 UTC to timestamp 2013-12-11 04:02:25 UTC.

Articles 1 through 20[edit]

Articles 21 through 40[edit]

Articles 41 through 60[edit]

Articles 61 through 80[edit]

Articles 81 through 100[edit]

Articles 101 through 120[edit]

Articles 121 through 140[edit]

Articles 141 through 160[edit]

Articles 161 through 180[edit]

Articles 181 through 200[edit]

Articles 201 through 220[edit]

Articles 221 through 240[edit]

Articles 241 through 260[edit]

Extended content

Articles 261 through 280[edit]

Section fine unless otherwise noted. Dana boomer (talk) 00:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Articles 281 through 300[edit]

Section fine unless already noted. Dana boomer (talk) 00:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Articles 301 through 320[edit]

Section fine unless otherwise noted. Dana boomer (talk) 22:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Articles 321 through 335[edit]

Extended content
More