6 September 2009

Green tickY - The source, published in 1922, is in the public domain. The contributor provided a proper edit summary when making the original copy paste and added a correct attribution to the bottom of the page. So there is no plagiarism. The remaining issues of OR, POV and notability have been left unaddressed. CactusWriter | needles 15:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY - Removed text from user page. CactusWriter | needles 16:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY - revised text to remove the paraphrasing issue. CactusWriter | needles 19:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY - Copyvio text removed. CactusWriter | needles 16:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Green tickY - Article was already G12 deleted. The newly created article has no copyvio. CactusWriter | needles 16:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]