|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Can anyone explain why the Overclock.net was somehow finally deleted ? Come on guys, it's a site that gives out so much technical information, so much guides, has a big user base, most questions get answered quickly, in the important sections contains well written english, has been cited in numerous computer related media ( Maxim, TechTV, and such ) It brings knowledge for free, isn't that what Wikipedia is trying to do ? At least, if you still do find the site as a notable one, it still acts like Wikipedia, and I think that you guys must consider as a little brother or sister, because of it spreading knowledge. Please, Keep it User:F2002yann
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Comment as I edited in the above, I want to announce that, although I initiated this discussion, now after seeing many facts, no longer want this debate to go on and withdraw my original opinion. Wooyi 23:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC) |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Our Article was deleted because the company didn't having enough impact in 2006. After months of working with the community and artists we would like to respectfully resubmit our article. We have been mentioned in several local magazines, the latest has can be found here: http://www.skorchmagazine.com/07-Feb/maghtm.asp?1=58&2=59. Sweetfox.com received approx 275,000 hits for the month of December. Original Message: [edit] Sweetfox Please reand through Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion especially Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7, Wikipedia:Deletion policy and especially Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations). Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:25, 22 September 2006 (UTC) No you don't have to be as big as ebay but you do have to have some sort of impact. Can you provide some sort of sources? An newspaper report or a online mention from a respected site (not somebodys blog) or something like that? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC) We were asked to provide a newspaper article, online mention, etc. and that is what we have provides. Please reinstate our article. End---- Sistersoldier24 22:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This article was deleted by someone who according to his user page is "on a break". How can you be on a break and still delete articles? It seems your not taking your work as a bureaucrat seriously then. (Not to mention of course that the delete was absolutely ludicrous, as the reasons given had nothing to do with standing procedure.)--82.92.181.129 20:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Had I known about its AFD, I would have commented there, but that time has passed. Omi is a main character in the cartoon Xiaolin Showdown. As such, he can have a separate article per WP:FICT and what not. However, Sandstein closed the AFD and deleted the article as it did not pass WP:V or WP:NOR. The only reliable sources about this character would be from the television show itself, and several fansites (honestly, at the show's official site, it's all flash so direct linking to a bio there is near to impossible). I wouldn't have objected to a merge, but barring the fact that if I undeleted to merge, that'd be wrong to do as a newbie admin.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This phrase gets plenty of hits on Google. Seems way over-the-top that it gets deleted, and protected on top of that. People can't even read the history! Call it "obscure" if you want to - but geez, leave it there. Text doesn't take up a whole lot of space you know.
Here are two groups on facebook Here is the transcript from the Today Show:
Here is the blogspot search 66.254.233.150 19:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Notable, and verifiable, even if not in the article. The deletion was done in process, and I have no problem with that, but the article was lacking. In particular:
Wikibofh(talk) 14:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Evil Inc is not a webcomic, it is a newspaper comic strip with a Web presence. Evil Inc is a daily comic strip that has over 11,000 daily readers (as of Jan. 2007). It is a spin-off of my first comic, Greystone Inn, which was launched Feb 2000. I have been creating a daily comic strip on a Monday-through-Saturday schedule ever since. Later this month, I will celebrate seven years of creating a daily comic strip. That's over 2,000 comics. Evil Inc appears in daily newspapers -- as did Greystone Inn -- the largest being the Philadelphia Daily News. It has a daily circulation of roughly 130,000. Newspaper readers are not included in the estimate of daily readers cited above. Adding even 1% of the circulation, though, adds another thousand or so daily readers. My two other comic projects, Courting Disaster and Phables, appear in newspapers (including the Philadelphia Daily News) as well. There are two Evil Inc graphic novels, distributed worldwide by Diamond Distribution. They are: -- Evil Inc Annual Report vol 1, ISBN: 978-1-4116-8070-8 -- Evil Inc Annual Report vol 2, ISBN: 978-0-6151-3620-2 I am also the author of "The Everything Cartooning Book," published and distributed worldwide by Adams Media. I find the Wikipedia entry on my strip to be a good resource for new readers. I would be very disappointed to see it disappear.
-Tbannist 22:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
I deleted this article after its prod period expired. User:Wafulz asked for undeletion, citing the following reason: Hi, could you restore this article? There are tons of references to it hockey-wise, and it's actually probably the most notably nickname in hockey: |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
A private school with 60 students which doesn't pass any criteria of WP:LOCAL and the proposed WP:SCHOOL. Although none of the keep !votes provided any valid arguments, the debate was closed by W.marsh as "no consensus". Three websites were added as a source, but none were reliable enough to establish notability. I don't feel it should be merged with Charlottesville, Virginia either. Michaelas10 (Talk) 11:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This article was deleted on the premise that it is not notable. however this center has appeared in the Sydney Morning herald as being one of only 2 stupas in Sydney which have Buddha relics from bodhgaya. See [2] Please restore Dutugemunu 08:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
The original deletion on 2006-12-05 was a result of a prod made by a known sockpuppet of JB196 named BooyakaDell. If its possible to retrive the first deletion of the British female wrestler who has now made a name for herself across Europe. --- Paulley 00:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |