Deletion review archives: 2010 October

13 October 2010

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
EXtremeDB (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

I am surprised this article has been deleted. I have read it before and I need to see again. Please undelete the article, due to having useful information in it and developers like me need to have access to it. I count on you to consider my request and publish the article -TheLadyBug1999 (talk) 17:52, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Endorse article was deleted as software spam and the comment above "developers like me need to have access to it" would seem to confirm that. Recommend getting your own web hosting someplace else. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the instructions on the deletion review page indicate, many issues can be resolved by asking the deleting/closing administrator for an explanation and/or to reconsider his/her decision. While not strictly mandatory, this should normally be done first. Did you try, and if not, was there some special reason? Stifle (talk) 15:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Endorse deletion by default due to nominator's failure to reply to a reasonable query. Stifle (talk) 09:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse deletion. The AfD was poorly attended, but the conclusion that the article should be deleted as spam is unimpeachably correct. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.