ComputerGuy (talk · contribs · count) I'm starting to do biannual check-ups on my editing, so I'd like to see how much I've improved over the last 6-7 months since my last review in December. –CG 20:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Reviews
- This is a brief review, I have mainly looked into the last 4 months of your editing. Very solid work here. I like the amount of dedication going into the highway articles. I dont think diversification into other articles outside of highway is necessary because you have a good niche here and are pushing these articles to their fullest . What would be good though is some more work showing extra policy knowledge ( though Im not to say you dont have that knowledge). The reasoning i have for this is i think theres alot of dedication to the project here and you could strengthen your chances up if you were to consider adminship (which may be something to consider) with some extra work in the next few months. Anyway I dont see any problems with your editing skills and think your doing a solid job. Ottawa4ever (talk) 22:27, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- I am a contrubutor to WP:USRD (mainly Washington roads) and I have gathered a total of 5 GAs over my year online. They are [in order]: SR 531 (WA), I-82, SR 527 (WA), SR 409 (WA) and SR 31 (WA). I am pleased at these articles because they show some of my best work. Some non-featured articles, like List of state highways in Pend Oreille County, Washington are also some of my best work.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I have numerous times, but when I tend to not "go with the norm" I switch over and apologize. If there is a major vandaliser or a user who is ruining my edits, I usually warn him/her and back out unless further harassment comes, then I call for help via IRC.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.