Edward130603 (talk · contribs) Hi! I am requesting an editor review so that I will know how to improve as a Wikipedia Edward130603 (talk) 21:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

• Hi there, Edward130603! As a newer Wikipedian, you're doing great on Wikipedia so far. Your vandalism reverts are greatly appreciated; however, to speed up the process you might want to consider using programs such as Huggle. Looking at your contributions, you also are doing well making contributions to articles. You should consider working in more collaborative areas of Wikipedia, such as WP:XfD or maybe even here at WP:ER. Keep it up! -download | sign! 22:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Hello! As a new Wikipedian (sorry, had to do that, Download :P), you are dong quite well. However, you might want to work on the Wikipedia space a lot more. For example, with only four edits to AIV, you might want to work on other areas, such as WP:CSD, WP:AFD, WP:UAA, WP:ANI, and a few more. In addition to simply contributing, it would be better if you concentrated on a single article before improving it to GA or even FA status. Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 23:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Haha! I've corrected my mistake. -download | sign! 04:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• You meet User:A_Nobody#RfA_Standards by having User:Edward130603/Awards and for having never been blocked.  :) Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   I am pleased most in helping revert vandalism. I like it when the site is "clean"

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   I don't thinks so. Once, I accidentally reverted a person's edit but the situation was dealt with nicely (with a smile)