Macys123

Macys123 (talk · contribs) It had passed 5 months since my last Editor Review, and I'll like to get another editor review. For now, my current tasks are reverting vandalism and vote on MfD discussions. This editor review may help me to be better on my tasks here on Wikipedia. Macy (talk) 23:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

I had mistakenly deleted and replaced a page and she caught it immediately and was polite about it. Thanks!

I edited a page concerning Basil D'Oliveria, which page was inaccurate as it stood. I corrected the inaccuracy and added a bit more information, this person said that my edit was 'unconstructive', if making something accurate is not constructive then what hope has the encylopedia got? This person obviously does not know the first thing about cricket. Ron Ipstone

Comments

My only advice to you would be not to get so involved with reverts/vandalism that you lose sight of editing and improving wikipedia. While the two work to the one and same result -a better wikipedia- giving your knowledge or skills (translation or otherwise) to wikipedia should be your first priority as others may not have these abilities. Just my opinion! Thanks for the welcome Sillyfolkboy (talk) 22:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could give more detailed reasons why you've reverted a page, especially a stub, as they could use more information. UMCPGreg (talk) 19:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Well, as I've said on my other editor review, I'm proud of my translations from Spanish Wikipedia, and I'm planning to translate more soon.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    Since the other editor review, I haven't been on conflicts with users.

was that little message on the leech page neccessary?i just wanted to join the sentence since it was seperated.