Featured and good topics in Wikipedia A featured topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles). A good topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles) with a less stringent quality threshold than a featured topic. This page is for the nomination of potential featured and good topics. See the featured and good topic criteria for criteria on both types of topic. If you would like to ask any questions about your topic and the featured/good topic process before submitting it, visit Wikipedia talk:Featured and good topic candidates. Before nominating a topic, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at Featured and good topic questions. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FTC/GTC process. If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the articles of the topic should consult regular editors of the articles prior to nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. The featured and good topics coordinators Aza24, MaranoFan and Gog the Mild determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates topic and archived. To contact the FTC coordinators, please leave a message on the FTC talk page, or use the ((@FTC)) notification template elsewhere. You may want to check previous archived nominations first: Purge the cache to refresh this page

Shortcuts WP:FGTC WP:FTC WP:GTC WP:GTN Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists Featured pictures Featured topics Good content: Good articles Good topics Featured and good topic tools: Topic criteria Topic candidates Topic removal candidates Nomination procedure Topic log Topics on the Main Page Former topics

Nomination procedure[edit] To create a new nomination use the form below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Saffron/archive1) and click the "Create new nomination" button. Once the nomination page is created, remember to transclude it in the appropriate section below, to leave nomination templates on the talk pages of the articles nominated for the topic. For detailed instructions on how to nominate topics or add articles to existing topics, see Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Nomination procedure. Supporting and objecting[edit] Please review all the articles of the nominated topic with the featured and good topic criteria in mind before deciding to support or oppose a nomination. To edit nominations in order to comment on them, you must click the "edit" link to the right of the article nomination on which you wish to comment (not the overall page's "edit this page" link). If you approve of a nomination, write '''Support''' followed by your reasons. Supports that clearly evaluate the criteria will be weighted more than those that do not. If you oppose a nomination, write '''Oppose''' or '''Object''' followed by the reason for your objection. Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to fix the source of the objection, the objection may be ignored. To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it. For a topic to be promoted to featured or good topic status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The FGTC coordinators are usually the ones to assess this consensus and close FGTC discussions. If there is a consensus to promote, the promote instructions are located here. If enough time passes without objections being resolved (at least one week), nominations will be removed from the candidates list and archived. Nominations will stay here for ten days if there is unanimous consent, or longer if warranted by debate.

Latin Grammy Award for Album of the Year

The Latin Grammy Awards are presented by the Latin Recording Academy to recognize outstanding achievement in the Latin music industry. The Album of the Year is one of the four accolades included in the General Field.

edit | discuss

Latin Grammy Award for Album of the Year

10 articles

Amarte Es Un Placer

Fijación Oral, Vol. 1

Para Siempre

Sale el Sol

Entren Los Que Quieran

En Primera Fila

Independiente

Hasta la Raíz

Salsa Big Band

Obras Son Amores

Contributor(s): Jaespinoza

The Latin Grammy Award for Album of the Year is part of the General Field of the Latin Grammy Awards. During 24 years handing those awards, 2 featured articles and 8 good articles have been written for winning and nominated albums, and this would make a good topic. --Javier Espinoza (talk) 00:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose the topic would need to include all the albums that won this award. 10\24 is cherry-picking at its finest. igordebraga ≠ 15:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per above. Idiosincrático (talk) 03:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose as incomplete. Queen of ♡ | speak 02:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  (As an aside, this is in the FTC section and categories, but isn't eligible even if it were complete (only 27.27% FAs) and the nom says [...] this would make a good topic. emphasis mine.) Queen of ♡ | speak 02:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Breathless

I'm Breathless is an album released on May 22, 1990, by Sire Records to accompany the film Dick Tracy. The album contains three songs written by Stephen Sondheim, which were used in the film, in addition to several songs co-written by Madonna that were inspired by but not included in the film. Madonna starred as Breathless Mahoney alongside her then-boyfriend Warren Beatty who played the title role, Dick Tracy. After filming was complete, Madonna began work on the album, with Sondheim, producer Patrick Leonard and engineer Bill Bottrell. In support of both I'm Breathless and her previous album, Like a Prayer, Madonna embarked on the Blond Ambition World Tour where a section was dedicated to the songs from the album.

edit | discuss

I'm Breathless

8 articles

"Vogue"

"Hanky Panky"

"Sooner or Later"

Dick Tracy

Blond Ambition World Tour

Blond Ambition World Tour Live

Madonna: Truth or Dare

Contributor(s): Chrishm21, 11JORN, IndianBio, Wildroot

Another work from WP:MADONNA, the soundtrack to Dick Tracy with all related articles - the movie, the Oscar-winning song out of it, two singles not related to the film, the album's accompanying world tour and the two movies that it inspired (a concert video and a documentary). igordebraga ≠ 19:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC) --igordebraga ≠ 19:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – I am not yet convinced that the film article, Dick Tracy, should be included. The film could probably have its own topic which might include this album, the motion picture soundtrack and possibly the successive video games. The album should be considered a subsidiarity of the film, not the other way around; that being said, I'm Breathless should still be a topic. Idiosincrático (talk) 02:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Midnights

Midnights is the tenth studio album by the American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift. With an understated synth-pop and electropop sound, Midnights is a concept album about nocturnal ruminations. Released on October 21, 2022, the album was Swift's fifth to sell over one million US first-week copies, and its songs made her the first artist to monopolize the entire top ten of the US Billboard Hot 100.

edit | discuss

Midnights

18 articles

"Lavender Haze"

"Maroon"

"Anti-Hero"

"Snow on the Beach"

"You're on Your Own, Kid"

"Midnight Rain"

"Question...?"

"Vigilante Shit"

"Bejeweled"

"Labyrinth"

"Karma"

"Sweet Nothing"

"Mastermind"

"Hits Different"

"Bigger Than the Whole Sky"

"Would've, Could've, Should've"

"You're Losing Me"

Contributor(s): Ippantekina, Ronherry, Gained, PassedDown, Infsai

This topic cover the album Midnights and its songs, and all articles have been promoted to GA. --Ippantekina (talk) 14:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support WP:SWIFT has already been noted as a busy bunch, good to see a neat demonstration. igordebraga ≠ 16:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Idiosincrático (talk) 03:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support: Meets criteria as far as I can tell. Will obviously need to include any songs that get turned into articles, but I'm sure the nominator knows that. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Damita Jo

Damita Jo is the eighth studio album by American singer Janet Jackson. EMI Music Japan released it first in Japan on March 22, 2004. Damita Jo debuted at number two on the US Billboard 200 and was considered a disappointment by the media compared to Jackson's previous efforts. To promote it, three singles were released: "Just a Little While", "I Want You" and "All Nite (Don't Stop)", while "R&B Junkie" was issued as a promotional single. Jackson's performance at the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show prior to the album's release, which ended in Jackson's breast being accidentally exposed by surprise guest Justin Timberlake, had a major effect on the album's commercial performance.

edit | discuss

Damita Jo

5 articles

"Just a Little While"

"I Want You"

"All Nite (Don't Stop)"

"R&B Junkie"

Contributor(s): Alex ^{reach me!}

I am nominating this since the lead article was recently promoted to GA. --Alex ^{reach me!} 20:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support no dearth of pop albums to become topics, it seems. igordebraga ≠ 16:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Great work on this topic. "All Nite (Don't Stop)" to this day is such a banger. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Idiosincrático (talk) 03:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trauma Center

Trauma Center is a simulation video game series developed and published by Atlus between 2005 and 2010. Beginning with Trauma Center: Under the Knife for the Nintendo DS, the series continued for four more entries; a Wii remake Second Opinion, and three original titles for DS and Wii. While now a dormant series, each entry saw positive reception and sales, with many gaming journalists praising each entry's controls for utilising hardware-specific elements.

edit | discuss

Trauma Center: Under the Knife

5 articles

Trauma Center: Second Opinion

Trauma Center: New Blood

Trauma Center: Under the Knife 2

Trauma Team

Contributor(s): ProtoDrake

I'm nominating this GT because I ended up doing a GA clean sweep of the series. I believe all of them cover each game in as much detail as is suitable for their quality level. While there would normally be a series article, there has been little to no commentary on the series as a whole despite its popularity during its period of release. Due to this, the series article has been redirected, and for this topic the lead article is the debut entry. The series is unlikely to see any additions in the near future, so the topic should remain stable. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support: Although the matter of a series article can't be helped in this scenario, the articles are all clearly related and linked together by a designated template, and since all the articles within are GA-class, the topic qualifies for promotion. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 18:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Meets all of the criteria. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support My second opinion is that this topic is in full health. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hold Scratch that, I think there's some latent GUILT in the patient that needs to be treated. Er... I mean potential for another article. Specifically, the series article is quite viable and probably shouldn't have been redirected just to fast track a Good Topic. Hardcore Gaming 101 goes over the series as a whole as a decent chunk of their review of the original Trauma Center, besides this retrospective that was already mentioned in the article. Combined with this overview of the series in Nintendo Power, I think it's absolutely salvageable and GNG passing. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I have to disagree. Again the commentary there seems too localized to specific titles over talking about the series as a whole. The main problem with the series article was it was parroting stuff from the articles. There was little to no overarching commentary, and the sources you've provided don't really solve that issue. --ProtoDrake (talk) 23:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on these three sources, I must agree with ProtoDrake. Hardcore Gamer's two articles are specific-game reviews, as is the Nintendo Power article. They describe the series in order to give context to the item they are reviewing. Only the USGamer (VG247) article is about the series as a whole. These three sources suggest the potential for a series article, but they would not be enough. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SIGCOV states that "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." Being specifically about the series as a whole has nothing to do with it really. So unless you are saying these are all trivial, that shouldn't apply. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am just suggesting that all of the information in these sources are summarily covered in the respective game articles. Only one of them features reception for the franchise as a whole. We could put together a somewhat functional article to encompass the franchise, but there's not really any reason to do it with these sources. The Gameplay and Legacy sections on Under the Knife have it covered. This might change if more retrospectives on the franchise as a whole are found or written, though. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 13:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason would be ease of navigation and to give people a proper landing page for learning about the Trauma Center series. At MOS:VG it is stated that as long as a series page "describe[s] the series as a whole in broader terms, such as what the games have in common. This could include general gameplay, and recurring elements such as characters and locations", and there are at least 3 entries, its existence is merited. The question should be why it shouldn't exist, and there appears to be no special reason in this case to inconvenience readers. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you joking? It also says "Avoid creating a series article that only repeats what sources say about the individual games, and instead base the article on what reliable sources say about the series as a whole.". Except that there aren't reliable sources that talk about the series as a whole, and you've been unable to produce them. --PresN 13:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To straight-up copy-paste my reply above, because it seems like it got ignored, Hardcore Gaming 101 goes over the series as a whole as a decent chunk of their review of the original Trauma Center, besides this retrospective that was already mentioned in the article. Combined with this overview of the series in Nintendo Power. These are the sources I have produced that prove a series page is possible and passes GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking bluntly, yes it's possible, but it'll also look like a giant echo chamber and that in my opinion is one of the worst kinds of Wikipedia articles. Speaking personally, and I may have to go back over some of my own contributions in light of these opinions, I dislike whole articles that just reproduce word for word, or with arbitrary variations. That's why I did the redirect. There was barely anything original, and even with those small bits you've found, they'll still be barely anything original. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, if what you are saying is true, I am doubtful any franchise article would exist - it would be required to only have navboxes connecting them, because any blurb describing the game, film or other media would be classified as an "echo chamber" and "repetitive content". Sometimes repetition is required to describe something in another article in which it appears. I am a bit flummoxed as to how that is a bad thing as long as it's not just a straight copypaste of the entire article. Sometimes people want a quick summary, other times a long examination of the subject. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:08, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – After quickly looking through each of the articles, I can say this looks like a lovely Good Topic. Excellent work, ProtoDrake! ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 09:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Solid topic, and I agree that a series article is not viable at this time. --PresN 13:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. I am convinced that a series article to serve as the main topic is not viable, at least not based on what's been presented. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - I'm gonna chime in a say that for the time being, it's best having all the series info in the article for the first game. Look at Knightmare on MSX for example. I condensed everything related to the trilogy into the legacy section, including the follow-ups, cameos, the unreleased stand-alone sequel, etc. I do feel that Trauma Center has potential to have its own series page more than Knightmare, not gonna lie, but i do agree with Drake's approach here. Roberth Martinez (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. It makes sense to have the first game here. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 17:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – per nom. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Hold until a series article is made per Zxcvbnm.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 15:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I do not know why the series article was "merged" with the first game of the series. I was planning to work that into a good article. It is not impossible to expand on it. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 02:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NWA World Historic Welterweight Champions

edit | discuss

NWA World Historic Welterweight Championship

8 articles

Negro Casas

Máscara Dorada

Mephisto

La Sombra

Volador Jr.

Matt Taven

Rocky Romero

Máscara Dorada 2.0

Fails criterion 3.b as Máscara Dorada 2.0 is not a WP:GA, isn't being worked on, and is past the three month grace period (he won the title on 15 December 2023). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist – per nomination. Idiosincrático (talk) 01:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Dean

edit | discuss

Hurricane Dean

5 articles

Meteorological history

Effects in the Lesser Antilles

Effects in the Greater Antilles

Effects in Mexico

Meteorological history of Hurricane Dean was demoted on 11 November 2023, and there is no effort to change that, and without it the topic fails criterion 3.b. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist – per nomination. Idiosincrático (talk) 01:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vince's Devils

edit | discuss

Vince's Devils

4 articles

Candice Michelle

Lisa Marie Varon

Torrie Wilson

Torrie Wilson was demoted on 19 December 2023, and there is no effort to change that, and without it the topic fails criterion 3.b. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist – per nomination. Idiosincrático (talk) 01:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna (album)

edit | discuss

Madonna

9 articles

"Everybody"

"Burning Up"

"Holiday"

"Lucky Star"

"Borderline"

"Physical Attraction"

The Virgin Tour

Madonna Live: The Virgin Tour

Fails criterion 3.b ever since "Physical Attraction" got an article in September, given it's still not a WP:GA. igordebraga ≠ 04:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist per nom. Idiosincrático (talk) 00:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove per nom.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 21:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Doesn't appear anybody is working on Physical Attraction. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of UEFA club competition winning clubs

edit | discuss

UEFA men's club competition winning clubs

6 articles

European Cup and UEFA Champions League

UEFA Cup and Europa League

UEFA Europa Conference League

UEFA Super Cup

UEFA Cup Winners' Cup

UEFA Intertoto Cup

Intercontinental Cup

The UEFA Europa Conference League is a relatively new competition and did not exist at the time of the 2008 FT nomination. Additionally, the Intercontinental Cup list did not exist at the time of the nomination either, it should be included as it was jointly administered by both UEFA and CONMEBOL, and the competition is included in the lead article tallies. Without these lists reaching recognised status, this topic fails criteria 1d and 1e, thus it should be delisted. The UEFA Women's Champions League list is not included as the lead article only outlines men's competitions. Idiosincrático (talk) 01:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try and get both of these lists up to featured standard in the coming weeks. Had forgot the Conference League list needed adding to the topic, likewise the Intercontinental Cup. NapHit (talk) 23:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hold – The UEFA Conference League list has since been nominated as an FL candidate. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Wait UEFA Europa Conference League is at FLC and there is desire to do the same thing for the Intercontinental Cup.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 15:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]