Now I think the article is good enough to be a featured one. I worked on this article in the spring and I don't even see how its content could be further expanded without going into unnecessary detail.--Hadrianos1990 15:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose still bags of manual of style issues, like citation placement per WP:CITE and a massive tendency to over-link things like La Liga. Also, raw URLs in the ref section are hideous. Use the ((Cite web)) template. Finally, on a brief reading, lacks citation and contains plenty of peacock terms and is too PoV. The Rambling Man 15:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I closed and archived the peer review; pls see instructions at both WP:FAC and WP:PR. This article failed GA two days ago. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]