- Article is no longer a featured article
This article is no longer featured quality because of these reasons:
- No references. There is no policy that says the references requirement is not retroactive. Help make wikipedia the most authoritative and accurace source of information in the world.
- It has a bit too many fair use pictures. One has no copyright information.
- Shouldn't it have a list of team records holders (eg: most career goals, assists, points, etc?)
- The facts section mostly duplicates the team box.
Michelle T 21:56, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Issues with hockey team page formatting are discussed here: Ice Hockey
- Remove. Having no references is enough for me (it's been plenty long enough), but add in way too much lists, poorly formatted prose, and the image problem and its a definite, I'd say. - Taxman Talk 22:49, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Remove Páll (Die pienk olifant) 08:31, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove Above criteria can be modified, however, I don't think the article even when these are changed is of FAC standard.--Knucmo2 00:21, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove For most of the reasons previously mentioned. The year-by-year results section is really large as well. It's got some good ideas behind team page formatting though, particularly the infobox. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:53, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]