The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 6:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC) [1].

---

New Carissa[edit]

Notified: [2], December 2021

Review section[edit]

I am nominating this featured article for review because in addition to the issues highlighted by Sandy on the talk page, I'm having trouble verifying some of the content in the cited sources and there is also unsourced content. (t · c) buidhe 18:17, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted the FV tag - the ref was there originally but removed without specific comment in May 2012, now restored - I'll come back and refine that with page numbers. I'm happy to help, but am not au fait with FA standards specifically, so need some relevant input to work round. Davidships (talk) 01:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some minor work on the article but do not wish to do more. The text needs to be checked against sources, and sources need to be reviewed to reduce duplication. At least two of the sources state there were 23 crew aboard while at least two more give 26, and none that I have seen indicate there was a "maximum" crew (either planned or actually on board). While this is a minor point it does reduce confidence. Kablammo (talk) 14:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to FARC there is still considerable unsourced content, no edits in the last week. (t · c) buidhe 02:51, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to FARC: no edits since Nov 16, and there's still uncited text. I also think the lede needs a copyedit and better formatting. Z1720 (talk) 04:23, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to FARC, no progress; no apparent interest. Kablammo (talk) 21:47, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section[edit]

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and prose. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist no edits since Nov. Concerns remain. Z1720 (talk) 18:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist lack of sufficient improvements so far. (t · c) buidhe 01:19, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist, issues remain, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:28, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the ((featured article review)) template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.