The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 08:44, 21 March 2007.

---

Poison gas in World War I[edit]

Review commentary[edit]

Message left at MilHist. LuciferMorgan 02:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Message left at User talk:Gsl. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe this article meets the current standards for featured articles. Some of the problems:

• Insufficient citations
• Sloppy references
• Tables are not standardised

On the upside the photographs are spot on. - Francis Tyers · 15:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This FAR wasn't listed here until I stumbled upon it and added it here. The 4 week period should begin from today. LuciferMorgan 02:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doesnt currently meet the FA standard.

• Increase size of lead to at least two large paras
• The effects sections is very short and should also be expanded
• Citations must be improved
• not sure about the table of Gases used, could this be turned into prose.

A bit of work to do. Hossen27 05:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Status — refs need a lot of work; not only are more inline cites in order, but they are just hyperlinks. No formal details or format for those refs, either.
• The prose — needs a runthrough. I found some redundancies on a quick scan, such as "in order" to. Most cases of "over (insert number here)" should be changed to "more than (insert number here)". Just minor stuff. — Deckiller 23:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary[edit]

Suggested FA criteria concerns are number and quality of references (1c), formatting issues (2), and prose (1a). Marskell 07:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove for now — lingering 1a issue, and 1c and 2 (mostly 2 in relation to references). — Deckiller 01:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove per Deckiller's reasoning. LuciferMorgan 22:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove per above.--Yannismarou 14:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.