Self nom. List is comprehensive and accurate. Similar in content to featured list Swedish football champions. Oldelpaso 22:03, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support, well referenced and clean list. No difference from the Swedish football champions list that would be reason enough to oppose this one. Although a picture would be nice. ;) -- Elisson • Talk 22:29, 27 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Picture added. I think I tagged it correctly, but somebody more familiar with image tagging ought to check it. Oldelpaso 21:27, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support - but would it be possible to add the number of points achieved by the winner and the runner up? It would also be nice to mention League and Cup doubles, teams remaining unbeaten (if any), European competitions also won, and any other interesting snippets in footnotes. (I would have made the similar comments about the Swedes.) -- ALoan (Talk) 12:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I've put in some additional footnotes. Oldelpaso 20:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support. I'd put notes above references, and "see also" to the very end of the article, but that's your call. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 12:45, 28 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support. It is a very good list. Carioca 04:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Comment: With the top scorers listed, it would be a nice addition to have the number of games during the season included somewhere. It would help differentiating a 20 goal/year tally from 43 goal/year and might put some perspective on the number of games now compared to then. Poulsen 08:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]