The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 23:40, 28 February 2009 [1].


List of Bleach chapters[edit]

Nominator(s): Tintor2 (talk)

I am renominating this for featured list after it had all its issues fixed from the previous nomination. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 03:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Truco

Comments from Truco (talk · contribs)

Lead
  • In Japan, they are published in Shueisha's Weekly Shōnen Jump since 2001. -- They are should be 'they have been'.
  • He also encounters former Soul Reaper Sōsuke Aizen who created an army of powerful hollow called arrancar to destroy the Soul Reapers' organization, Soul Society. -- Comma before who
  • An anime adaptation, produced by Studio Pierrot and TV Tokyo and airing on TV Tokyo, premiered on October 5, 2004. -- Reword to An airing of a anime adaptation, produced by Studio Pierrot and TV Tokyo, premiered on TV Tokyo on October 5, 2004.
  • Viz Media released the first volume on June 1, 2004, as of December 2008 twenty-five volumes have been released. -- Comma should be a semi-colon not a comma.
List
  • From my standpoint the listings seem fine, but I would seek a copyedit of the summaries of the chapters. But first of all, where are these based from?--TRUCO 02:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Done the lead fixes. The summaries are based on the volumes. Is there any notable grammar issue?Tintor2 (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, where do they come from. Are they reworded statements from another website? I'm not sure, but its a lot of content and a copyedit would be nice, just in case.TRUCO 21:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, they were made based on the volumes. If not they would be breaking copyvio.Tintor2 (talk) 22:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, then. Due to that, it is best to seek a good copyedit of them. For now I will Weak Support this nomination (since it meets the rest of the WP:WIAFL criteria) until a thorough copyedit is done.--TRUCO 22:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Resolved comments from Goodraise

Resolved comments:

  • Romaji titles need title-casing.
  • "048. Menos Grande (メノスグランデ Menosugurande)" - No need to give romaji in this case.
  • Ref 2 misuses the "title" parameter. Either give the chapter name or use the "chapter" parameter.
  • Ref 61 needs a publisher.

-- Goodraise (talk) 21:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Tintor2 (talk) 22:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Ore-sama no na wa Ganju" -> "Ore-sama no Na wa Ganju"
  • "Renshūkyoku Op.1" -> "Renshūkyoku op.1"
  • "Hitori - ō no Kodoku" -> "Hitori - Ō no Kodoku"
  • Link the publisher in ref. 59 and 61.

-- Goodraise (talk) 22:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Tintor2 (talk) 22:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support, until a prose expert says it meets 1.a. -- Goodraise (talk) 22:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Meets the featured list criteria. -- Goodraise (talk) 01:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Note I have done two complete copy-edits (summaries only), one here and another here, after the summaries were expanded. I will repeat that I did not look at the lead. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did some light touching up of the lead, nothing major. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:32, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.