The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 5 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Juhachi 08:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Based off the layouts of the other featured lists at Wikiproject Football, but with some additional sections that I thought are relevant. I believe it meets the featured list criteria (see /checklist), but that's up to you to decide :) Cheers, Daniel Bryant 08:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Support as nominator. Daniel Bryant 08:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Image:CC Mariners 2005 PSC.jpg would probably make a better lead image.Circeus 15:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  I was bold and went ahead and did that. -Phoenix 16:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  OK, thanks. Daniel Bryant 00:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Questions: The list is accurate as of April 20, 2006 and yet it has players from 2007? I assume this is a typo? Also, what is the distinction between 2007 and present? Are players with 2007 listed no longer on the team as of today?--Jayron32|talk|contribs 18:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  With regards to 2006, yes, that was a typo - fixed. Thanks very much for that. With regards to present etc., the notes for the table include:

  "Matches for CCM" dates are from season of first game for the Mariners to season of last game for the Mariners, with 'present' used if still at the club. (e.m.)

  The source for this is CCM, where you can see the note "* = de-listed player" at the bottom. Yes, you are correct in interpreting that players listed "-2007" have been delisted, but played their last game for the Mariners early this year. Daniel Bryant 00:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Cool, it makes sense now. Thanks for clearing all of that up. This list is great and deserves to be supported! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 23:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — perfect accompaniment to Central Coast Mariners FC; well-referenced and detailed - a credit to the encyclopedia, and a worthy addition to our ever-expanding collection of Featured Content. anthony^[review] 09:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support gets my backing too, a fine article. The Rambling Man 10:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks :) Daniel Bryant 03:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, certainly a model for a featured list, I hope the other A-League team lists can be this good eventually. --Canley 08:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's on my to-do list :) Daniel Bryant 09:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. It's a nice list, but can it ever be considered stable (criterion 1e)? JPD (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Criterion 1(e) I have always taken to refer to the stability of an article vis-a-vis edit warring. This article does not seem to have been the subject of such. Updating an article to keep it up-to-date and accurate does not make it unstable, it makes it a model example of how wikipedia should work.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 23:53, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, unstable is interpreted as either a) edit warring or b) being the subject of a major incident (for FA, the perfect example is the recent FAC of Virginia Tech massacre). I concur with Jayron. Daniel Bryant 00:58, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]