The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 11 December 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]

---

List of Music Bank Chart winners (2016)[edit]

List of Music Bank Chart winners (2016) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of Music Bank Chart winners (2016)/archive1

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Nominator(s): EN-Jungwon (talk) and Jal11497 (talk) 16:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the fourth Music Bank related list that I am nominating. I started working on it back in April and now I believe that it is ready to become a featured list. -- EN-Jungwon 16:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

• "Both singles spent a total of ten weeks at number making Twice the act with the most wins of the year" - as you literally just mentioned in the last sentence that each single spent five weeks at number one, I think this could be expressed more elegantly as "The total of ten weeks which the singles spent at number one made Twice the act with the most wins of the year"
  • Done.
• "The group ranked four singles at number one in 2016 achieved with "Sing for You", "Monster", "Lotto" and "For Life", the most of any act in 2016" => "The group achieved four number ones in 2016, the most of any act during the year: "Sing for You", "Monster", "Lotto" and "For Life"."
  • Done.
• "Member Baekhyun along with Miss A member Bae Suzy won their first Music Bank trophy for their collaboration song "Dream"." - specify first solo trophy, as Baekhyun had previously won as a group member (and Bae Suzy may have done too, I haven't checked previous years' articles)
• "A number of acts achieved their first number ones in 2016." - would this not make more sense being placed before the previous sentence?
  • Done.
• ""Monster" by Exo (pictured) earned the highest score of 2016, with 11,570 points at the June 17th broadcast." => ""Monster" by Exo (pictured) earned the highest score of 2016, with 11,570 points on the June 17th broadcast."
  • Done.
• The singer called Bae Suzy in the prose is only called Suzy in the image caption and in the table - any reason for this?
  • Done.
    • She's still just recorded as Suzy in the table.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:16, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:59, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @ChrisTheDude all done. Apologies for taking over a month. I had completely forgotten about this until I saw your edit on my watchlist. -- EN-Jungwon 12:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by RunningTiger123[edit]

• No reason to bold "Music Bank Chart" (MOS:BOLDAVOID)
• "had hosted the show and continued to do so till" → "had hosted the show; they continued to do so until" (better flow, better word choice)
• "on November 4 and the following week" → "on November 4, and the following week" (avoid run-on sentence)
• Link to Exo should be moved to its first occurrence in lead
• "'Making A New Ending For This Story'" → "'Making a New Ending for This Story'" (occurs twice)
• Images need alt text

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RunningTiger123 all done. Thanks for the review. -- EN-Jungwon 07:54, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I changed one sentence (the same one RunningTiger123 also mentioned), but other than that found little to complain about. I'd quibble about whether or not the songs beginning with "the" or "a" should not sort under those letters, but I'm willing to let it go since this is a South Korean list and I'm not sure if the sorting rules work differently for English-language titles of South Korean songs. Consider changing them, though, if that is more correct. In any case, also passing the source review, so I'm going to go ahead and promote. --PresN 18:52, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the ((featured list candidates)) template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.