The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 22:52, 25 June 2008 [1].


Scarborough F.C. seasons[edit]

This list has been moulded into the shape of other season lists which have all successfully gone through the WP:FLC process, and I feel it now passes the FL criteria. It also went through a peer review. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 15:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Gary King (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)

About it from me. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

The reference section needs work. Some of the notes are footnotes, some are references. Therefore, the section should be called "Notes" or split into a footnotes and a references section. I would prefer how it's done in this list: Gillingham F.C. seasons. Create a references section for the "General references" as they are called now and create a "notes" section for the footnotes and specific references. Also, there is no point in repeating the whole thing every time you mention a page number, "Adamson, p. 15" will do. Baldrick90 (talk) 18:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Matthew
  • "when the club first competed in the FA Cup to 2007, when the club folded." Huh?
  • How was the Midland league stronger?
  • I thought the Football Wikiproject's stance was that anyone who played professional football was notable enough for a Wikipedia article. If that's the case, all those without links need linking.
    • WP:BIO states that subjects must have "competed in a fully professional league", which the players without links have not done. Mattythewhite (talk) 07:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why are some names only one? Are they like Madonna and Gucci?
  • The key section should appear before the table. A reader is going to look through it wondering what everything means.
Matthewedwards (talk contribs  email) 03:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.