Selection of high-quality pictures by the community
Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.
- Promoting an image
If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.
For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.
All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here.
The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results.
If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.
- Delisting an image
A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.
Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture.
For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.
However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance.
Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.
- Note that delisting an image does not mean deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article(s).
|
Featured content:
Featured picture tools:
|
Step 1: Evaluate
Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations.
|
Step 2: Create a subpage
- For Nominations
To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.
- For Delists (or Delist & Replace)
To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.
|
Step 3: Transclude and link
Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list (direct link).
|
How to comment for Candidate Images
- Write Support, if you approve of the picture. A reason is optional.
- Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the picture. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. If your concern is one that can only be addressed by the creator, and if they haven't nominated or commented on the image, and if they are a Wikipedian, you should notify them directly.
- You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
- To change your opinion, strike it out (with
<s>...</s> ) rather than removing it.
- If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.
- Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.
- Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version.
How to comment for Delist Images
- Write Keep, followed by your reasons for keeping the picture.
- Write Delist, followed by your reasons for delisting the picture.
- Write Delist and Replace if you believe the image should be replaced by a better picture.
- You can weak keep, weak delist or weak delist and replace instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
- To change your opinion, strike it out (with
<s>...</s> ) rather than removing it.
Editing candidates
- If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g., add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (e.g., Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied.
Is my monitor adjusted correctly?
In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting.
Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting.
On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate.
Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended.
|
- To see recent changes, purge the page cache.
Current nominations
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2022 at 17:26:56 (UTC)
Original – Chipmunk with stuffed cheeks in Prospect Park (Brooklyn, NY, USA)
- Reason
- Was seen on Commons FPC four months ago, where it was featured unanimously.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Eastern chipmunk, Tamias
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
- Creator
- Rhododendrites
- I didn't know we allowed pictures of "stuffed" animals. ü
– Sca (talk) 19:24, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2022 at 17:18:18 (UTC)
- Reason
- Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Sailfin snapper
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
- Creator
- Llez
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2022 at 13:52:36 (UTC)
- Reason
- Quality portrait of Art Tatum, innovator in jazz piano. For details see the lead section of his article. On a sidenote, he lost his left eye in his twenties. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Art Tatum, Bop City
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- William P. Gottlieb, restored by User:Ras67
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2022 at 11:39:15 (UTC)
- Reason
- This was part of a delist and replace a while back that didn't get enough participation. I think it's a superb image for chromolithography as it shows the various colours used in it.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Chromolithography, Gabrielé Castagnola
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others
- Creator
- Gabrielé Castagnola, restored by Adam Cuerden
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2022 at 03:51:07 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality 1967 image of Antônio Carlos Jobim, restored by me. Best EV of all images on C:Category:Antônio Carlos Jobim
- Articles in which this image appears
- Antônio Carlos Jobim
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/People/Entertainment
- Creator
- Photographer unknown, restored by User:PerfectSoundWhatever
Alt — un-cropped version.
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2022 at 01:31:34 (UTC)
- Reason
- Quality image of this marine mollusc. I agree with the comments of User:Poco a poco (who does underwater photography) and User:Ikan Kekek on Commons nom here about the quality of this photo. It is photographed with a high quality camera and lens (at f/22 and iso160) Exif here. FP on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Goniobranchus kuniei
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Molluscs
- Creator
- photographer: q phia
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2022 at 00:40:18 (UTC)
Original – The bathhouse in
Gnesta, Sweden, c. 1900
- Reason
- A nice example of a historic image, and the only historical image we have for this (admittedly small) town in Sweden.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Gnesta
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
- Creator
- Amadeus Bianchini(sv), restored by Adam Cuerden
- Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 00:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Comment – Must have been a dreary day in Gnesta, the article about which is a 78-word stub. – Sca (talk) 12:56, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Admittedly, like the Marburger Schloss, this would go onto POTD/Unused until the article improved. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 15:57, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support – good restoration, but the article is weak. The Swedish article has plenty of content (history, buildings, etc.). I added an expand-translate tag [1]. Bammesk (talk) 02:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose - Grainy, terrible composition, boring. ProfDEH (talk) 07:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- That street lamp floating in the air is rather a problem. -- Sca (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Admittedly, that's croppable in theory. I just don't like doing that kind of crop. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 20:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose - Fails criterion #3, not among Wiki's best... --Janke | Talk 14:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose per ProfDEH — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 04:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2022 at 01:21:49 (UTC)
- Reason
- Quality image of Savonia railway line in Finland. It shows a Sr1 locomotive hauling lumber across an interesting looking drawbridge. Saw this on Commons recently.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Savonia railway, Vertical-lift bridge
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Land
- Creator
- David Gubler
- Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 01:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support - I put it in Vertical-lift bridge, too. --Janke | Talk 15:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 06:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support Surprisingly sharp given how long the train is and the presumption it was moving. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 16:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- No surprise with an exposure time of 1/1600 sec (0.000625)! ;-) Assuming the train moves at 50 km/h, it moves only 8 millimeters during the exposure... --Janke | Talk 19:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- True, but that also limits the amount of light let in. Basically, I'm impressed at how well focus, exposure, focal plane, and so on were used. There's really not much notable blur until you get right back towards the land in the distance, which is great focal depth. Sure, maybe the smooth concrete structure helps with that, but it's still very well done. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 21:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support - DreamSparrow Chat 18:42, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support. MER-C 18:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2022 at 11:24:36 (UTC)
Original – NGC 2014 (top and right) with NGC 2020 (bottom left).
- Reason
- Was seen on Commons FPC three months ago, where it was featured unanimously. High resolution.
- Articles in which this image appears
- NGC 2014, NGC 2020, List of Hubble anniversary images
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
- Creator
- NASA, ESA, and STScI
Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2022 at 11:06:19 (UTC)
Original – Rooftop garden at The Essex, Manhattan, New York City, US. Among the plants grown are tomatoes, chili peppers, lettuce, herbs, carrots and beetroots.
- Reason
- Was seen on Commons FPC last year, where it was featured unanimously.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Roof garden, Urban agriculture
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Rhododendrites
- Support as nominator – MER-C 11:06, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Comment – Not readily apparent what we're looking at. – Sca (talk) 12:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- That's why FPs have captions... ;-) Support --Janke | Talk 13:19, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support – Yann (talk) 20:47, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 06:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support Focus is better near the bottom of the image, but given it's presumably a drone shot, and likely had to go through a certain amount of perspective correction, I can buy it. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 14:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Not a drone shot, just saw an opportunity from being up high. Perspective correction nonetheless, of course. I figure at 62 MP, some smallish focus issues aren't a big deal (we could sharpen it by downsizing by 50% and it'd still be pretty big -- not that I'd suggest something like that). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:30, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I'm impressed at how well the perspective adjustment is done, then. I was expecting a shot from fairly nearly above the garden. Though I suppose the perspective isn't really in line with a drone hovering above its centre, in retrospect. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 18:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support – interesting subject, well done and high resolution. Bammesk (talk) 00:17, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 04:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Nominations — to be closed
Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.
Closing procedure
A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Jujutacular/closeFPC
When NOT promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
((FPCresult|Not promoted| )) --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing
((subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name))
on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.
When promoted, perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
((FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG)) --~~~~
- Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:
- Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Add the image to:
- Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
- The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
- Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
- Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using ((Featured picture|page_name)) (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
- If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
- Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing ((subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx)) on each nominator's talk page. For example: ((subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg)).
- If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place ((subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx)) on the creator's talk page. For example: ((subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg)).
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line
((Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name))
to the top of the section.
- Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the August archive. This is done by simply adding the line
((Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name))
from this page to the bottom of the archive.
- If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Delist closing procedure
Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.
If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:
- Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
((FPCresult|Kept|)) --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.
If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
((FPCresult|Delisted|)) --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace the
((Featured picture))
tag from the image with ((FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''))
.
- Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.
If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:
- Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
((FPCresult|Replaced|)) with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
- Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
- Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
- Replace the
((Featured picture))
tag from the delisted image with ((FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''))
.
- Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag ((Featured picture|delist/image_name)) (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with ((missing image)).
- Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
- Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.
Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:
- Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line
((Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name))
to the top of the section.
- Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line
((Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name))
to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive.
- If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.
Recently closed nominations
Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2022 at 18:35:23 (UTC)
Not for delisting: the newly promoted FP
- Reason
- Replaced with newly promoted FP File:Landscape Arch Utah.jpg.
- Articles this image appears in
- None
- Previous nomination/s
- Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Landscape Arch
- Nominator
- MER-C
Delisted --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2022 at 19:22:51 (UTC)
Original –
HMS Malabar observes the final fate of
USS Missouri, after an accident set it on fire near Gibraltar in 1843.
- Reason
- It's a lovely lithograph; stable in the lead for Malabar for quite some time.
- Articles in which this image appears
- HMS Malabar (1818). Just added to: USS Missouri (1841), Edward Duncan, Thomas Goldsworthy Dutton
- FP category for this image
- WP:Featured pictures/History/USA History? Though it's hard to say as it's focusing on Malabar.
- Creator
- Thomas Goldsworthy Dutton's lithograph of Edward Duncan's artwork based on George Pechell Mends' sketch. Restored by Adam Cuerden
Promoted File:Edward Duncan - The Explosion of the United States Steam Frigate Missouri.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2022 at 05:25:48 (UTC)
Original – Hand-colored silver albumen photograph taken by Kusakabe Kimbei depicting a Meiji-period woman wearing a kimono with an underkimono patterned with chrysanthemums
- Reason
- This photograph, taken during Meiji-era Japan by renowned photographer Kusakabe Kimbei, is a rare historical photograph that provides users with a color image of early Meiji-era dress in Japan. The picture is of historic nature and is of high quality, especially for its era. The use of hand-coloring by the photographer accentuates the value of the image, providing viewers with a glimpse of what life looked like in Japan without having the whole photograph be in black-and-white or Sepia. As confirmed by the Getty Museum (which verifies the authenticity of the photograph and holds the photograph in its collection) the photograph is in the public domain. Its encyclopedic value is clear; the article specifically had described patterns of chyrsanthemums on Meiji-era dress, but lacked depictions of any such clothing until the picture was added to the article. Digital manipulation was limited to cropping to remove faded edges.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Japanese clothing during the Meiji period
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle
- Creator
- Kusakabe Kimbei (1841–1934)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 10:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2022 at 09:35:18 (UTC)
- Reason
- encyclopedic and high quality
- Articles in which this image appears
- The Shah Is Gone
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others
- Creator
- Ettela'at (newspaper)
- Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 09:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose – The fact that it's in Persian/Farsi would seem to limit its intelligibility for readers of English Wiki. – Sca (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- There are thousands of pictures with non-English text in English Wikipedia articles. This is not a convincing reason. By reading the description of the photo, the reader can easily find out the subject of the photo. Alborzagros (talk) 07:49, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- So why run the image if readers have to consult the article to understand it? Circular reasoning, IMO. -- Sca (talk) 13:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Because it's a notable event. That said, I'm not that convinced by the reproduction, though: The attempt to give a pure white background has absolutely destroyed the photos. If this was a good copy of the newspaper, I would enthusiastically support it, but look at the upper photo, even at thumbnail you can see the lines going through it, and the artifacting gets far weirder if you zoom in - what's with that very strange smear on the man's back? Newspaper reproduction of photos could be quite bad, but this is beyond that, so, unless we can get a better copy, Oppose. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 14:21, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose. That smear looks like a failed cloning attempt to remove some splotches: [[2]] (low res). --Janke | Talk 06:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Comment – It's not a picture, it's a PDF. – Sca (talk) 12:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I don't think that's entirely an issue, as they can be displayed like pictures, but, yes. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 16:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 10:40, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2022 at 18:11:26 (UTC)
Original – Marburger Schloss, south side
- Reason
- Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Marburger Schloss, German Fairy Tale Route
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- A.Savin
- Support as nominator – MER-C 18:11, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support --A.Savin (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose – Target article text totals 87 words – a mere fragment of a stub. (The German article is as long as your arm, as befits a castle that purportedly dates from the 11th century.) Initially I was tempted to vote for this just because I was there once, but das wäre inakzeptabel. – Sca (talk) 12:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Sca: I'd say go ahead and vote for it, but I'll add it to WP:POTD/Unused under "Ones primarily blocked by articles" until the article grows a bit. Also, Support Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.1% of all FPs 14:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Spoze I could translate parts of the German article -- it's a fairly famous castle -- sorta busy now -- maybe some winter's night, assuming we ever get winter again. (104/40 due here today.) -- Sca (talk) 14:59, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I've added it to German Fairy Tale Route, if that helps. --A.Savin (talk) 00:19, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support – Yann (talk) 21:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support – Bammesk (talk) 23:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 06:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Promoted File:Marburg asv2022-02 img18 Castle.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 21:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2022 at 18:08:24 (UTC)
Original – White teatfish (Holothuria fuscogilva), Ras Muhammad National Park, Red Sea, Egypt.
- Reason
- Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Holothuria fuscogilva
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Echinoderms
- Creator
- Diego Delso
Promoted File:Pepino de mar (Holothuria fuscogilva), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-28, DD 119.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 20:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2022 at 02:15:31 (UTC)
Original – Clear grey-blue celestine crystals
- Reason
- Quality lead image of this crystal. Saw this on Commons recently.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Celestine, Acantharea, Biomineralization
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology
- Creator
- Ivar Leidus
Promoted File:Celestine - Sakoany deposit, Katsepy, Mitsinjo, Boeny, Madagascar.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 06:39, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2022 at 23:36:50 (UTC)
Original – Poster for
Il trovatore, showing the end scene where de Luna (centre) learns the person has just sentenced to death, and whom Leonora (lower right, dead
[1]) was in love with instead of him... was, in fact, his long-lost brother whom he had been looking for the whole opera. Oops!
- ^ It's an opera. What did you expect?
- Reason
- Previous nomination was during a bad time, I think - lots of images failed around then - but it was praised here, and passed with unanimous support on Commons.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Il trovatore, Luigi Morgari
- FP category for this image
- WP:FP/THEATRE
- Creator
- Luigi Morgari restored by Adam Cuerden
Promoted File:Il trovatore by Luigi Morgari.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 06:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Suspended nominations
This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.