Comment It's a quality image, but I don't think it passes core criteria 'Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree you can nominate the infobox image taken in daylight used in the same article. MarvellousSpider-Man 12:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Contours of the building more clearly highlighted owing to the lighting. Infobox image offered as an alternative is too tightly cropped — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Per Spider-Man. Plus, the building front below the portico appears overexposed due to lighting. Sca (talk) 14:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually both the pictures are not perfect. The daylight picture has a fountain blocking the view. It has trees on it's sides, but the night picture has no trees! MarvellousSpider-Man 15:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Evening shot is more appealing for me than the daylight one, and it's a quality image on Commons. Brandmeistertalk 14:53, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
* Quality image doesn't mean much. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]