Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2012 at 09:48:52 (UTC)

Reason: Good lighting, clearly shows the animal's side profile, already in the article and I just moved it to the lead spot for higher EV
Articles in which this image appears: Cheetah, Werribee Open Range Zoo
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Fir0002

Support as nominator --Pine^✉ 09:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Small size, and I'm not sure I like the back lighting. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I know this is a personal thing, and I'm not even sure if it's actionable, but I'm totally against featuring pictures of animals in captivity. I feel they should be presented in their natural habitat, and no matter how much a zoo or safari park tries to emulate it, it just isn't. Sorry. I love big cats, too. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) 15:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Since I haven't found a very good quality picture of a Cheetah, I've uploaded one I took myself. It's undownsampled 18mpix and yet quite sharp. I think it's worth being the lead picture of the Cheetah article and being nominated here as FP. What do u think? - Blieusong (talk) 21:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite the promised 18mpix :( because of cropping. Hope it's still big enough. - Blieusong (talk) 21:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]