Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 17:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support both, prefer originalTomer T (talk) 14:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why is this not in infobox if it is to be considered the most valuable? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There was a short discussion about the lead image in Talk:Kobe Bryant#Infobox picture. This picture was also suggested, but some editor liked another photo for it being an "action shot"; though it's not in FP standards and low resolution. The fact that the image is used in 6 articles though adds to the EV even though it's not the current lead. In addition, there aren't many as good basketball images, especially not from 2005, and there are no current NBA players FPs at all (Buddy Hield's FP is from his time in the NCAA). This one is of one of the most iconic NBA players of all time (certainly top 10, I'd say top 5 all time), which makes it highly valuable. --Tomer T (talk) 08:37, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support good shot even for current cameras --Petar Milošević (talk) 07:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt 1 WB is better here. Too much gren on original. --Petar Milošević (talk) 04:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, prefer Alt 1, better colors – Bammesk (talk) 00:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Original, Support Alt 1 - I prefer the colors and crop of the source photograph (unnominated). Plus the highlights in the nominated original are blown, especially on the shoulder. I created a new derivative from the source photo in which the only change is adjusting the curves (to avoid blowing out the highlights). Kaldari (talk) 02:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also it looks like the original was skewed to make it look like Bryant is standing up straighter (rather than slightly hunched to the right as in the source photo and alt 1). Kaldari (talk) 02:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]