Reason: A large, high-quality and technically excellent image of a significant species of fungi. Already featured on Commons and the Turkish Wikipedia.
Articles this image appears in: Lycoperdon perlatum
Creator: Daniel Ullrich (Commons/German Wikipedia)

Support as nominator --J Milburn (talk) 23:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support - (Changed from support) Blur at the bottom. I knew I saw something. Ceran^→//forge 23:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The top is blown and it appears that the camera only focused on the sides and not in the middle. The bottom, however, is blurry from the edges and the lighting is not equal. It is noticeable as a thumbnail, and definitely noticeable when zoomed. Zoo Fari 23:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support This picture is eye catching, with good EV. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 23:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 23:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Durova^Charge! 05:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose per ZooFari's analysis. ~ ωαdεstεr16_«talk^stalk» 06:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose due to blown highlights and shadows detracting from the image, still useful though.Terri G (talk) 20:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. To put ZooFari's comments in different terms, the DOF is simply too shallow, with front and centre quite out of focus. I liked the thumb, but was disappointed with that aspect of it at full res. Sorry. --jjron (talk) 14:14, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 01:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]