Certainly eyecatching. Obvious EV in all four usages, but as a noted and influential artwork, rather than as a portrait. The quality of the reproduction is high, and it comes from a reliable source.
Support as nominator --J Milburn (talk) 16:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the caption should emphasize that it's not an actual portrait, but rather a satirized depiction. Twilightchillt 20:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed—I changed the caption to remove the word "likeness," which was inaccurate: a likeness by definition is an accurate portrait. Chick Bowen 23:09, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's a fair point. I actually dithered over the word to use. Like I say though, the EV of this image derives from its artistry, not the fact it is a portrait of a noted person. J Milburn (talk) 23:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support my goodness, that is quite ugly indeed! Certainly eyecatching. Scan quality is great, too. Although, it does seem slightly dark... Purpy Pupple (talk) 00:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant. May be a decent choice for April Fools'. Jujutaculartalk 01:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm sure I remember waking up with her...and she certainly didn't look like that the night before in the bar after several dozen pints... Lemon martini (talk)