Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2015 at 16:15:39 (UTC)

Reason

Didn't achieve the basic Doesn't achieve the current criteria of "minimum of 1500 pixels in width and height", the sun reflecting off the water also a serious problem.

Articles this image appears in

Hanko

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hankopan.jpg

Nominator

Exploringlife (talk)

• Delist — Exploringlife) 16:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Ah, a little "retaliation" for my comments about the Hong Kong photo?? Or how else did you find this? ;-) BTW, the size criteria were different when this photo was awarded FP status in 2006... --Janke | Talk 17:35, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sure not a revenge, actually I've seen a delisted one recently in FPC, which also due to pixel problem, so I'm afraid of your featured picture will also be eliminate, even the delist not nominate by me, but someone must nominate in the future. I want to save your photo, but not destroy your contribution. You push me to make progress, I push you to make progress, everyone are pushing each other to make progress for a better life/living. Finland is your homeland, you must easily to retake this photo again and get a better effect than previous one. In fact, I won't mind the results even fail or elect of my photos, if my portfolios paid with sweat and physical strength are totally worthless due to resolution problem, then l'll accept without excuse and buy a better camera to replace with, also consider to withdraw from this election. Exploringlife) 19:27, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - We historically haven't delisted on resolution alone. Not sure the technical issues are enough to merit delisting.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Delisting on resolution alone sets a bad precedent. This was a point of discussion in the past, and the general consensus was that pictures which have achieved FP status can't lose that status due to it not meeting the current criteria. I must say I strongly agree. Picture still contributes a fair amount of value to the article, it's a good quality picture overall. Must oppose delisting. Dusty777 01:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Dusty. Samsara 02:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep if we get a better shot we can replace it, but we don't have one yet. Belle (talk) 08:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep --Tremonist (talk) 12:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:01, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]