< August 30 | September 1 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted by Backslash Forwardslash (talk · contribs) as unambiguous copyright infringement (non-admin closure). — Σxplicit 04:50, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete. Image fails WP:NFCC #8. The image is not necessary to understand the article. It just shows what the actors looked like. -Nv8200p talk 12:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep Skier Dude (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete per consensus that image fails WP:NFCC #8. -Nv8200p talk 13:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: - Delete as failing NFCC#8. As for the image below, neither keep argument shows how the image significantly adds to reader's understanding - Peripitus (Talk) 07:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: - Delete - as failing NFCC#8. Non-free images must do more that simply illustrate - as this is what all images do whether they are decorative or not. It must be shown how they significantly add to reader's understanding and the arguments below do not demonstrate this - Peripitus (Talk) 07:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Stupid editorial is *so* the rage on Wikipedia. Keep it. 202.37.64.48 (talk) 02:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
((duplicate|Dozor-600_Maks2009.jpg))
92.46.145.13 (talk) 22:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]