The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosalyn1_SMALL.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dbestarchitect (notify | contribs).

• Derivative works, therefore non-free. PhilKnight (talk) 00:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not free since they are drawings of someone else's work, although I'm sure the editor meant well.Steve Dufour (talk) 09:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment If this is deleted, File:Mr Spittle2.jpg, File:Mr Spittle.jpg, and File:Susie1 SMALL.png also should be. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 00:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ShahidParvez_young.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Music_archive (notify | contribs).

• Tagged as ((pd-self)), however seems unlikely given the age of the photograph, and web resolution. PhilKnight (talk) 00:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ShahidParvezKhan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Music_archive (notify | contribs).

• Tagged as ((pd-self)), however seems unlikely given the age of the photograph, and web resolution. PhilKnight (talk) 00:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:UstShahidParvez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Music_archive (notify | contribs).

• Tagged as ((pd-self)), however seems unlikely given the age of the photograph, and web resolution. PhilKnight (talk) 00:22, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all three unless the photographer provides more information.Steve Dufour (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all three no sufficient verficiation of permission. Hekerui (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. I'm basing this on the comments by those who feel that the rationale is significant and J Greb's apparent agreement that the new FUR is acceptable. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AdventureComicsVol2-001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Blue Mirage (notify | contribs).

• Unsourced and improperly FURed. The FUR lists the source as "Cover to Adventure Comics vol. 2 #1 (June 2009)", there are a number of problems with that:

1. Covers to comic books have titles, company logos, price boxes, UPC boxes, etc on them, not just the art. This also clashes with the "Portion used" statement of "Full cover".
2. There is no "June 2009" issue to pull information from, much less scan.
3. To date no solicitation has been produced by DC Comics for a revival of the series. Solicitations, either in print or on line, are the common source for cover art. No such link is provided. J Greb (talk) 13:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The feel is of someone ripping off the company's artwork, not a picture which would help us understand the subject.Steve Dufour (talk) 14:49, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I have modified the FUR to better suit the needs of Wikipedia, it is now properly sourced and given an exceedingly better rationale. --CmdrClow (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  The new FUR does address the issues that had me bring this to IfD, especially the fundamental one of sourcing the file. As for the additional reason added by Steve Dufour, I don't think the image breaches WP:NFCC#8 - the image does work with the text of the article to enhance understanding to a degree. - J Greb (talk) 15:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep FUR seems sufficient for the article in question — BQZip01 — ^talk 04:32, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - in the context of other covers from comic books, this doesn't significantly add to the reader's understanding. I'm not convinced there is a need for 3 non-free images, especially considering 2 of them depict the same character. PhilKnight (talk) 23:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LesserYellowlegs23.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Big iron (notify | contribs).

• Obsolete by File:Lesser Yellowlegs.jpg, Low quality, Orphaned ZooFari 19:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antiguo portal web de la EET n°479.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ruuta 25 (notify | contribs).

• Copyvio: image is a non-free screenshot of a website, incorrectly claimed as PD. Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 19:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo EET n°479 Santa Fe ARG.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ruuta 25 (notify | contribs).

• School logo claimed as PD but almost certainly not free. No fair-use rationale is given and I don't see any need for it in the article where it is used. Uploader has a long past of uploading copyvio files. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 19:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WKAD.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lord Opeth (notify | contribs).

• The cover of this book is not of any significance. The use of a non-free image is not justified. J Milburn (talk) 22:48, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Picture of book cover does nothing which justifies its use since copyrighted.Steve Dufour (talk) 06:21, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eat_Bulaga.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dico_Calingal (notify | contribs).

• Doesn't significantly add to the readers understanding. PhilKnight (talk) 23:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.