The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. As I understand it, this is PD-text, and so the whole argument is moot. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I don't see how the article Kawasaki Ninja meets the criteria in Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. But if Wikipedia can use this logo, then we would want to replace the current one with an example that better meets the criteria for logos anyway, such as the GIF here. This would moot Mattofwashington's request to either CC license his photo or delete it and all would be well. --Dbratland (talk) 22:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]