The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bank Millennium branch Poland.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PrinceGloria (notify | contribs | uploads).

Unused .png version of File:Bank Millennium Branch Poland.jpg. PNG is too large to be displayed smoothly, uncommon file format for photographs, unlikely to be of use. (JPG version is fine.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per nom, if the files are same (this particular PNG doesn't load for me). Rehman 08:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete only half loads for me. ^walk victor falk ^talk 16:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:TaizePrayer.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikimonk (notify | contribs | uploads).

The original file from fr.wp was deleted with the following reason (via google translate): " Deleting an image of the category Picture of unknown source since January 2007" Bluemask (talk) 08:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It was deleted by a robot for being unsourced. If the attribution was malformed on fr.wiki it is no reason to delete it here, is it? Considering what the Taizé Community is, there is ample reason to assume it was uploaded by a member. ^walk victor falk ^talk 21:39, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • It wasn't deleted for having "malformed" attribution, but for not having any attribution at all. If it hadn't got source info there, it has none here, which makes deletion inevitable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• It's the same image that was used on the cover of a Taizé book publication from 2002 [1] (although that's a slightly smaller crop, so ours is not just a scan from there). Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. Delete. ^walk victor falk ^talk 15:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Delete per nom. Good work! Mootros (talk) 16:32, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naphthdisulf.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Meodipt (notify | contribs | uploads).

Obsolete. Tagged for low quality and replaced by commons:File:Naphthalene-1,5-disulfonic acid.png DMacks (talk) 10:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perennialyangmin041.0-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by icetea8 (notify | contribs | uploads).

orphan icetea8 (talk) 13:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aluminium-borohydride.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NotAnonymous0 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Poor quality (resolution/pixelation), and incorrect (per Aluminium borohydride, the title compound is verifiably not a collection of separate ions as the diagram says) DMacks (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Selma Middle School website.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bahn Mi (notify | contribs | uploads).

Screenshot of a school's Web page used to illustrate the article about the school. Fails WP:NFCC#1 because it is potentially replaceable by free content for the purpose it serves (a photo of the school would actually be a lot better than this image). Also fails WP:NFCC#8 because a screenshot of the school's Web page does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the school itself. —Bkell (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, website screenshots aren't useful for any organisation articles except for web-only entities like Google or Amazon. I can't possibly see how this image could pass either 1 or 8, as you mention above. Nyttend (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bedford Oct 2006 - 20.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LaurynK (notify | contribs | uploads).

First off, this image is essentially (but not 100%) a duplicate of Commons image File:Bedford 2006 63.jpg; there's no reason to have multiple almost-identical images when the local one isn't used. Moreover, this looks as if it's cropped from a Flickr image — it can't be cropped from Flickr because it was uploaded here a year before the date on the Flickr file. It's exceedingly unlikely that two different authors would take identical-looking photos of the same exact subject, so I believe that both this image and the one at Flickr are copied from some third location, making this a copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 21:31, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - TinEye http://www.tineye.com/search/6a608ebede5c2025862838ebb624677615f8a4ad/ shows a perfect match, with the flickr image being much wider, showing the WP one is cropped - Note how the few white dots of the background match, that could not happen with 2 similar photos..  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Seems fairly likely the uploader and the flickr account holder are the same person, which would also explain how they could have access to these different versions of the same shot. Wikipedia images are credited to "pauline keightley", which matches the name used on some copyright marks on the flickr account, and also the apparent initials of the Flickr user ("pkimage"). Profile information on Flickr and editing profile here on Wikipedia seem compatible (promotional interest in certain bands). Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Occam's razor favours Future Perfect at Sunrise. ^walk victor falk ^talk 15:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.