The result of the discussion was: problem fixed. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The chart is incorrect, showing production in northeast US when production is in southeast US (Georgia and vicinity states). Original uploader is blocked for sockpuppetry. Wonder if it was a form of vandalism vs an error. MartinezMD (talk) 01:16, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Poorly-rendered svg, missing stereochemical details critical for knowing that this even is the title compound. Many alternatives, including non-bugged svg, in commons:Category:Mannitol DMacks (talk) 03:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work of copyrighted sign (work of state government, not federal). Image of sign not necessary for understanding the concept, so fails fair use as well. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free movie screenshot used in movie article and (without an additional FUR) in article about actor. Apparently random scene, not embedded in any analytical commentary in either article; only purpose seems to be to underline the mere fact that the actor starred in the movie. Fails NFCC#8 in both cases. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete as hoax, kudos to Hohum for catching this Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:10, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unecyclopedic, faked, compare to the original here: http://content.answcdn.com/main/content/img/getty/6/5/2642765.jpg (Hohum @) 21:31, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]