The result of the discussion was: Keep Danger (talk) 17:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: no consensus, as it's a free image and there are no BLP concerns, that defaults to keep. This falls squarely into the "not worth arguing over" category. --B (talk) 01:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete. Would otherwise have been a keep if not for File:TheClevelandShowPromo.png, which also illustrates the family, and the article contains no discussion of the characters' original appearances, which would be required for the contextual significance requirements of WP:NFCC#8. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This image does meet the non-free image policy. Only one rationale in one article, not in the other article. JJ98 (Talk) 09:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, photo of copyrighted packaging Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, superseded by File:Benztropin.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, photo of copyrighted sign Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:13, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
photo of nonfree advertisement, does not significantly contribute to readers' understanding (WP:NFCC8) Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, photo of copyrighted packaging Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
photo of copyrighted sign, does not significantly add to readers' understanding Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, photo of copyrighted newspaper Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, photo of copyrighted dvd covers Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]