The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johnny Lujack.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jweiss11 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Fair use rationale is based on the subject being deceased; Lujack is still living Jweiss11 (talk) 03:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frank Salvato.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FrankSalvato (notify | contribs | uploads).

• No longer useful after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Salvato II.  Sandstein  06:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I concur with nominator. --Kumioko (talk) 04:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ekolagnight.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kehz99 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unused photo of some lights in a city at night. Even if I knew what city this was, it wouldn't be a useful photo because I can't see anything in it. —Bkell (talk) 07:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jandarm with RATMIL 96.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ayceman (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Can find no evidence that images of the Ministry of National Defense of Romania are in the public domain - and the image has no precise link to check whether it is from the ministry. Uploader hasn't responded to follow up for two weeks. Hekerui (talk) 09:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weapons presentation ro mv.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ayceman (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Can find no evidence that images of the Ministry of National Defense of Romania are in the public domain - and the image has no precise link to check whether it is from the ministry. Hekerui (talk) 09:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saur I.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ayceman (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Can find no evidence that images of the Ministry of National Defense of Romania are in the public domain - and the image has no precise link to check whether it is from the ministry. Hekerui (talk) 09:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Source: http://www.mapn.ro/fotodb/20071018_2/Transportor_amfibiu_blindat_Zimbru . The picture was taken during the public trials of that vehicle. Someone needs to find out if pictures from the Romanian MOD can be considered press releases (and, as a result, public domain). I've mailed mapn.ro to ask for a permission to use the photos from the gallery, but the answer was that pictures could be used only on wikipedia, only if the image of the Army is not touched and only for subjects depicting the RoArmy. As a result, I couldn't obtain an OTRS number because of these conditions. Mircea87 (talk) 11:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Fair use rationales are not in order, and as this is a non-free image, I must delete it for that. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:1956 Hungarian Stalin head3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mosedschurte (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unnecessary decorative non-free picture of the head of a statue. Conveys no relevant information by itself. Damiens.rf 16:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Not decorative; does impart a feeling of the state of Hungary–Russia relations at that time.  Sandstein  23:40, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the main Hungarian Revolution of 1956 article already has a different photograph of the same destroyed statue. In Hungary-Russia relations there is zero analytical commentary, neither of the image in itself, nor even just of the specific event (i.e. the destruction of the statue, rather than just the revolution as a whole). It may be highly symbolic, no doubt, but imparting "a feeling" is beside the point here: what it needs to impart is not feelings, but information, in much more concrete terms, and that's only possible in connection with concrete discussion in text. (Incidentally, the embedding of the image in that article has been apparently so random and unmotivated that it was allowed to sit there with a vandalised, completely irrelevant caption for almost four months [1], without anybody noticing.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Historical significance. The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 (of which the destruction of the Stalin statue was a major symbol) is one of the most important events in the recent history of Hungary. The fact that there exist other images too, does not mean that this one is useless. Qorilla (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • But it means it's not minimal usage. --Damiens.rf 14:01, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joseph Auslander.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Emerson7 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Per the copyright page of this collection at LOC,[2] the copyright holder, Bachrach Studio, must be contacted for use of this particular photo. Kelly ^hi! 18:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.