The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This file is only used on two pages - Pregnancy (mammals) and Pregnancy - it is inappropriate for the former page, and easily replaced on the latter (there is an ongoing RfC on this matter. Further, the licensing of the file is disputable: it was originally released as CC, which the author later retracted. WHile it is technically legitimate to continue using it under CC rules, it would be better to respect the author's wishes in this matter. Ludwigs2 00:41, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader is unlikely to be the author. Copyright claim not credible. Image widely available on the net (http://www.caravanmagazine.in/Story.aspx?Storyid=213&StoryStyle=FullStory) Uploader multiple copyright offender (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARossi101&action=historysubmit&diff=447447280&oldid=446912947). Elekhh (talk) 01:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, low quality; better map used in infobox of Algoma, Oregon article Jsayre64 (talk) 02:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 06:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to subjects been unidentified Acather96 (talk) 06:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Photo of a vehicle, a free license photo could easily be obtained, thus this fails NFCC 1. Acather96 (talk) 07:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OB. Identical SVG file exists in Commons. Also, updated PNG file is uploaded to Commons. Beagel (talk) 09:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unusably low quality. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Low quality orphan image without description. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 15:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned to another identical logo. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:09, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 19:52, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]