< September 8	September 10 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A no-longer-used WikiProject assessment tool. Replaced by File:USRD cumulative wikiwork over time graph.svg. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 02:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. Dough 48 72 03:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A no-longer-used WikiProject assessment tool. Replaced by File:USRD relative wikiwork over time graph.svg. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 02:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. Dough 48 72 03:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan. I uploaded this image, but is no longer relevant to the article for which it was created and unlikely to be useful for any other article • Astynax ^talk 07:05, 9 September 2011 (UTC)* Note: The file was moved from File:Worker2x201.jpg to File:Faceless Workers.jpg by JohnnyMrNinja (talk · contribs) at 21:41, 14 September 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of a inactive user, no encyclopaedic use. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 08:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, orphan file. No foreseeable use. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 09:17, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:P1000592.JPG. The two picture are almost the same. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 09:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no apparent encyclopedic value, could easily be recreated using plain text if needed. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned to File:Battlefields in The Global War on Terror - edit01.PNG Sven Manguard Wha? 10:32, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned to File:Battlefields in The Global War on Terror - edit02.png Sven Manguard Wha? 10:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm cool with this and the previous pic being deleted. But I must ask this, did you post each of these (and the message to my talk page) manually? Chocolate Horlicks (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He used Twinkle, which makes nominating images (and other things) for deletion very fast and easy. –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does not add much of anything to the article, therefore fails NFCC 8. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no description. Appears to be userphoto of long gone user. Sven Manguard Wha? 10:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs) — ξ ^xplicit 00:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent copyvios. Images are at http://www.uelisteck.ch/en/galleries.html with a © notice and no indication of a free license. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:30, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs) — ξ ^xplicit 00:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently photographs of the uploader. Not used on any page, nor are they likely going to be (uploader hasn't contributed since 2008). Nightw 13:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs) — ξ ^xplicit 00:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Same reason. Appear to be photographs of the uploader or some other non-notable person. Not used on any page, nor are they likely to be in the future (uploader hasn't contributed since 2008). Nightw 13:35, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See nomination directly above, but not sure about this one. In any case, it's not used in any articles and no description has been given so it's difficult to identify the individual pictured. Nightw 13:56, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The school changed its name so I removed the image from the article, doesn't qualify for fair use anymore CutOffTies (talk) 17:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:10, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Private image uploaded by myself long ago for user page, now no longer used by me or anybody else and orphaned. No foreseeable use. Also nominating the file below for the same reason. —Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 17:58, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete? I suggest you just tag them with ((db-author)) and specify that you don't want them anymore. Nightw 19:37, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, have done so. —Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 19:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And they're gone. —Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 20:02, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A fan-made cover. Hung Medien site often has fan-made/unofficial covers. The song has not been released to iTunes or Amazon and this Hung Medien seems to be the only source that has this cover. Oz ^talk 20:58, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

September 9

File:USRD ttl wikiwork over time.png

File:USRD rel wikiwork over time.png

File:Faceless Workers.jpg

File:P1000051.jpg

File:P1000384 (Small) (Custom).JPG

File:P1000591.JPG

File:Austin Outrages June 1, 1887.jpg

File:Battlefields in The Global War on Terror.PNG

File:Battlefields in The Global War on Terror - edit01.PNG

File:Bassmild.png

File:Bjornar simonsen3.png

Photos from Ueli Steck's website

Uploads by Liveandyetdie4

More uploads by Liveandyetdie4

File:Mayer.JPG

File:Logo-claremont.jpg

File:Cliftonian.png

File:Keri hilson feat nelly-lose control s.jpg