The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A "compromised" poster as the texts are alterted. Compare: http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2012/11/26/61/0301000000AEN20121126009700315F.HTML Puzzlet Chung (talk) 02:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused personal photo. Cloudbound (talk) 02:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 02:28, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound (talk) 02:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 02:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Superceded in use by File:69th INF REG COA.gif. Cloudbound (talk) 02:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. No foreseeable use as the subject of the photo is not the building. Other photos already do the job. Cloudbound (talk) 02:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is an Instagram photo which has reasons given for NFCC that are not strong enough, mainly because the uploader didn't want to say "I wanted this in the article because it will satisfy readers' morbid fascinations because the plane this was taken in crashed 15 minutes later." Moving down the requirements list, the picture quality is terrible, and there is already a better picture available for identification of the subject in the info box, so there is no "contextual basis" here (per NFCC 8). This is not replaceable, apparently because it is an "historic photo that will be used for identification of the subject"...except there's a better photo already in the article (fails NFCC 1). Minimal use - "used justifiably" is not an answer to this, and I would posit that it does NOT convey significant information as required (fails NFCC 3). We have no idea if NFCC 2 is met - the photographer died in the crash of the plane this photo was taken in, and I do not believe that the assertion for NFCC 2 can be made here by a third party. MSJapan (talk) 18:17, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Superceded in use by File:1894-LAHS-footballteam.jpg. Cloudbound (talk) 22:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. No foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]