< December 13 December 15 >

December 14

File:Thomastroubridge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 22:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomastroubridge.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DO'Neil (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Lower quality version of Commons file File:Sir Thomas Troubridge, 1st Baronet.jpg Rd232 talk 01:44, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Rhinoceros painting.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Rhinoceros painting.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DO'Neil (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Lower quality version of Commons file File:Pietro Longhi - The Rhinoceros - WGA13408.jpg. Rd232 talk 01:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:G-Dragon performing at Mnet MAMA 2012 in Hong Kong.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:G-Dragon performing at Mnet MAMA 2012 in Hong Kong.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beahye (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Copyrighted photo of a living person. Even with permission fromauthor, copyirghted photos of living people are not acceptable under free use policy. 小龙 (Timish) # xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng 14:18, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lucinda Moyers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: DELETE. postdlf (talk) 05:51, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucinda Moyers.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by EditorE (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image appears to violate WP:NFCC#8 for its use in Alex Trebek. It is being used to illustrate a fairly minor incident, and her image for identification does not help to understand Trebek's robbery and subsequent injury. Further, from the latest news I've discovered she pled not guilty. I haven't seen any results from an actual trial, so using the mugshot for a non-notable person without evidence of guilt for the illustrated incident also raises WP:BLP concerns. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:56, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Knockcroghery.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. I found one of the images in this collage here, where it is not cropped. Throws uploader's claims entirely out the window. — ξxplicit 01:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knockcroghery.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by J.daly2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

On this image's talk page the uploader claims the images were made by him and his friends, now he removed the "no source" tag with a claim they are all his own work. He also uploaded a blatant copyright violation stolen from here as File:Roscommon Hospital.jpg, now deleted, as well as another copyright violation to the commons as commons:File:Sacred Heart Home, Roscommon.jpg. Based on these examples I don't trust this uploader or any his images. ww2censor (talk) 20:55, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it would be best to delete all of the images I have uploaded. A photo taken by me has been deleted already based on the (mistaken) belief that it was "stolen" from another website. In fact, that was a photo I created and allowed my local hospital to use in its literature. This photo was apparently subsequently used by the HSE's website and therefore appeared, at first glance, to be the property of the HSE.
Neither I nor my friends wish for our personal details to be displayed on Wikipedia. If we cannot display our work without including our personal details, then we consent to having it removed. I can appreciate the need to have verifiable images on Wikipedia and understand your reasons for not wishing to use our work.JD2 (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roscommon Views.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete per blatant lying above. — ξxplicit 01:15, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roscommon Views.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by J.daly2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Based on this uploader's other copyright violations I don't trust that this montage is all his own work. See nomination for File:Knockcroghery.jpg above on this page. ww2censor (talk) 21:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.