The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails NFCC as image of living persons Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A self-published piece of original research. As far as I can tell, nothing like this has ever been published in reliable sources. SmartSE (talk) 10:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A photo montage of 14 album covers ,(all which are pictured elsewhere on WP) is completely inappropriate (eg counts as 13 non-free images (white album is uncopyrightable)) MASEM (t) 17:11, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hit&run editor with WP:OR about a perpetual motion machine DMacks (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No proof that the author has released the license under a free license Werieth (talk) 20:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]