< December 24 December 26 >

December 25

File:Redfinlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, but a local image description page exists. If you are wanting the image deleted, please nominate it for deletion on Commons. If you are requesting deletion of the local image description page only, use ((db-nofile)) if possible; if that is not possible, list it at WP:MFD. AnomieBOT 08:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Redfinlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jcasebmw (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Obsolete (OB) -- Replaced by File:Redfin logo.png

Pinstripepolo (talk) 07:36, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1cotton.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:1cotton.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mjpresson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--a free image could be captured. —Justin (koavf)TCM 10:08, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Will.i.am - Scream and Shout.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Will.i.am - Scream and Shout.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sauloviegas (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC condition 3a. minimal usuage "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information.". At the page for Scream & Shout it is noted that the CD single has an alternative cover to the digital single. However it is the CD Single which contains a cover that has an image of Britney and Will.i.am whereas the digital cover contains purely just text and a logo. Per condition 3a. only one of these covers can be used. Per condition 8. contextual significance, " Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic". Omitting the text-only cover is not detrimental to the article - it would be easier to explain this in text than to try and describe the CD single cover which actually has a lot more content that would need description should it be omitted. In short, WP:NFCC does not allow the use of multiple covers unless they are significantly different and their removal would harm understanding of the subject. — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 14:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Watami picturemenusample1.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Watami picturemenusample1.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nesnad (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A non-free image, simply taken through a tracing function in a vector graphics program, primarily to make the dubious claim that it's not a derivative work because it's a "computer graphic of the menu" and not a photograph. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think that's how I created it. It's been too long, but I believe I used PD images sources and some text layout tracing if I remember. But I agree an image with no sources is not easy to fight for, but I made this a million years ago. Now I am sure to link to all PD or CC sources. So I wont argue for this kept, you're not the only one that wants it gone. So poof goes the file if you so wish it. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 10:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PhillJupitus.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PhillJupitus.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mister Alcohol (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR--not needed for critical commentary, nor significantly increase understanding. —Justin (koavf)TCM 19:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Strangler Lewis2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strangler Lewis2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BobJones77 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Source site does not provide any evidence that this photo is pre-1923. howcheng {chat} 00:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.