The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, but a local image description page exists. If you are wanting the image deleted, please nominate it for deletion on Commons. If you are requesting deletion of the local image description page only, use ((db-nofile)) if possible; if that is not possible, list it at WP:MFD. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Obsolete (OB) -- Replaced by File:Redfin logo.png
Pinstripepolo (talk) 07:36, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Invalid FUR--a free image could be captured. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:08, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NFCC condition 3a. minimal usuage "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information.". At the page for Scream & Shout it is noted that the CD single has an alternative cover to the digital single. However it is the CD Single which contains a cover that has an image of Britney and Will.i.am whereas the digital cover contains purely just text and a logo. Per condition 3a. only one of these covers can be used. Per condition 8. contextual significance, " Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic". Omitting the text-only cover is not detrimental to the article - it would be easier to explain this in text than to try and describe the CD single cover which actually has a lot more content that would need description should it be omitted. In short, WP:NFCC does not allow the use of multiple covers unless they are significantly different and their removal would harm understanding of the subject. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 14:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A non-free image, simply taken through a tracing function in a vector graphics program, primarily to make the dubious claim that it's not a derivative work because it's a "computer graphic of the menu" and not a photograph. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Invalid FUR--not needed for critical commentary, nor significantly increase understanding. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Source site does not provide any evidence that this photo is pre-1923. —howcheng {chat} 00:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]