The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused file that essentially duplicates File:Renault Sport F1 Logo White Background.jpg. Also distorts the logo. SuperMarioMan 01:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan photo seems to be personal photo. Delete per WP:NOTBLOG -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
wp:hoax. This is a photoshopped Vita handheld. Microsoft hasn't released, nor announced any such device. Latest confirmation one doesn't exist is from June 2012. Uploaded by a user creating hoaxes and has been warned. « ₣M₣ » 15:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by January (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A free photo of him exists. Since he was not primarily notable for his looks, a picture of him later in life will serve the same purpose as this one. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The source isn't very detailed, but he looks old on the photo, so it was probably taken at the end of his life. Photos taken before 1946 or published before 1957 are in the public domain in Japan and such files are also in the public domain in the United States if published without a copyright notice before 1989. Thus, it is possible to replace this photo by a public domain photo, for example by the Commons photo shadowed by this one. Stefan2 (talk) 17:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
essentially equivalent to the Commons version of the image commons:File:CPSM Ribbon.png (off by 4 pixels so not eligible for WP:CSD#F8) Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 19:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan image of two photos put together, one of popcorn and one of nachos no sources or licenses are listed for the original photos. No use of photo as is. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not buying the fair use rationale used here. The organization represented by this logo is not the primary subject of the article it is used in, indeed it is way down at the bottom in the "other uses" section. I don't think that is an acceptable fair use of a logo, as the article does not "contain critical commentary about the brand" as indicated in the FUR language. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#1 (see shadowed Commons file) and WP:NFCC#10a. Also, the fair use rationale doesn't seem to have all required components, so I'm not sure that it passes WP:NFCC#10c either. Stefan2 (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]