The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hook (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NeoBatfreak (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unnecessary album cover. Soundtrack not main topic. George Ho (talk) 02:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Whether or not the soundtrack image is significantly different from the poster image since the hook itself is in both, the soundtrack itself is not notable and could not have an article created about it. Aspects (talk) 09:52, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:CensoredRogerRabbit.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ranze (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

As Masem, without adequately sourced discussion about another edition, this image is unnecessary. There is already the first edition cover, so this edition is unneeded, unless sources are found. George Ho (talk) 02:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The "Edition differences" section is full of original research and without reliable sources to back up the information, the second image is not needed in the article. Aspects (talk) 09:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Secret (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Nenokkadine Audio Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pavanjandhyala (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates Manual of Style - Film/(Soundtrack), because as per Consensus the Album cover should not be used in Infobox album. Also more than one Non-free image should not be used in an Article. Raghusri (talk) 12:03, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Sourced to a studio portrait in Scotland c.1880 (see http://www.missionarybiographies.com/images/slessorchildpdf.jpg and other places). Added to the article now. Far too usefull an image to let go - Peripitus (Talk) 12:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary-slessor-and-adopted-children.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jonathanriddell (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan, undated, source dead. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:38, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. January (talk) 00:08, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plate XX Vima Kadphises.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Per Honor et Gloria (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Not necessarily PD-UK, R.B Whitehead died in 1967. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:41, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• It is on the other hand ((PD-US-1923-abroad)). Why didn't you check this first? --Stefan2 (talk) 18:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winchmore Hill Station.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rich Farmbrough (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Undated, Dead source, so status not possible to confirm. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:03, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. New URL for source found here, which dates it to approximately 1870. Given that date I don't think we should have any problems assuming this is PD. Dpmuk (talk) 15:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - New infromation provided. PD-1923-abroad.

Further information - [[1]], If this is the same Wiliam Atwood , then he was 49 in 1911. Unfortunately the 1951 census (Which narrow it down still further) isn't yet public ... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC) Strike that, doesn't make sense.[reply]

However, [2] mentions a Wiliam Atwood, son of William Samuel Atwood. Given the Photo Date the image is likely to be the Father [3] - died 1913. It's PD old 70, (becoming PD old in January) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. January (talk) 00:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary Russell, Duchess of Bedford.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Craigy144 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Undated, dead source. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Check the Waybackmachine: http://wayback.archive.org/web/20051119001349/http://lafayette.150m.com/bed1693e.html

Not sufficient information to tell whether it is a published photo, though. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The archive link says that the photo was published in The Ladies' Field, 21 May 1898. -- Diannaa (talk) 02:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, yes, I must have overlooked that. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Time for closure? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Closed: Duplicate request. See the section immediately above. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary Russell, Duchess of Bedford.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Craigy144 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Undated, dead source. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.