< October 28	October 30 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is just a picture of some characters. Something like this only belongs in List of Futurama characters, where a different image is used instead. Also, the FUR is invalid as it doesn't tell where in the article the image is used. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFC#UUI §6: the images (the characters) have their own articles. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:03, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:40, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:45, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:45, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:47, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - not needed to understand the article; used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 00:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep Image used to help infidelity the episode at first glance, to help readers looking into an episode who may not be sure the article they are reading is the episode they were looking for. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That may be. But they can read the plot summary. Also, images have to pass every inch of WP:NFCC, and it blatantly fails #8 as it's basically a nondescript shot of characters. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 18:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those less familiar with the series may not be able to identify the charterers by name. An image would help them especially if no other images of the characters exist on Wikipeda. Grapesoda22 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is composed of free content as much as possible. When non-free media are used, it's for very narrow and specific purposes. This has no particular educational value and isn't used for identifying the episode as a part of its branding or visual identity. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:37, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic + orphaned, possibly attack image. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 10:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic, orphaned, no description etc. Acather96 (click here to contact me) 10:37, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Superior available here —Шαмıq ☪ _тαʟκ✍ @ 14:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Useless orphaned image —Шαмıq ☪ _тαʟκ✍ @ 15:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is not orphaned as it is used on Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Images to improve/Archive/Oct 2007. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 17:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G10 by JohnCD (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 17:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 17:22, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 18:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to be a copyright violation of http://ice-gay.com/357609/femdom-goddesstion-session/ (possibly about 5 minutes into it – but I don't want to look too much of it as I don't find it very interesting). --Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 20:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 20:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Copyright violation of http://ilbazar.forumc ommunity.net/?t=3566241&p=43063837 (remove the space in the URL to view the source page, see also WP:SPB). --Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 21:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It gives an excellent understanding of not only Meredith Hunter's situation but also of the violent conditions of the concert that just a description could arguably not replicate, no free image is available and it is low resolution. Ruprecht27 21:48, 29 December 2013

There is no critical discussion of what it looked like when he was standing in the crowd, so that aspect violates WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's a dude in an ugly suit, standing in a crowd. It adds nothing at all to the reader's understanding of the event. Perhaps a still form the fight and stabbing itself could be used, but the motion and camera jerk at that moment may make for something too blurry to be useful.Tarc (talk) 21:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8 in 2013 Egyptian coup d'état and WP:NFCC#1, 8 & 10c in Military beret. We also have free images of the person, see Commons:Category:Abdul Fatah al-Sisi. Stefan2 (talk) 23:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The image should not be deleted - it is an iconic image as it shows the moment General Sisi announced the coup on Egyptian State Television. The free images available on Wikimedia are generic images of General Sisi, while the article is about the coup, not about General Sisi. IbrahimNemsi (talk) 20:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Yes, the article is about the coup not al-Sisi and it is a very notable picture that shouldn't be deleted. Though i think a picture from Egypt's national television would be better than ONTV. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 13:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no sourced critical discussion about what this man looked like on television. See WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

October 29

File:Futurama 103 - I, Roommate.jpg

File:South Park Hot Tub.jpg

File:South Park Cancelled scene.jpg

File:HowToEatWithYourButt09.gif

File:Lisa Gets an "A".png

File:Springfield Up promo.jpg

File:Lisa vs. Malibu Stacy.jpg

File:South Park Casa Bonita scene.jpg

File:Futurama 301 - The Honking.jpg

File:Futurama-Ghost in the Machines.png

File:World War Zimmerman.png

File:C0llinztoady.jpg

File:C1zYD.jpg

File:NUST University logo.jpg

File:Urdi pak motto.png

File:Redler.JPG

File:Retardowski.jpg

File:RevRapter.JPG

File:Mrhastings.jpg

File:Mulberries.JPG

File:Mule cup2.jpg

File:Meredith Hunter Altamont.jpg

File:General Al-Sisi, announcing the removal of President Morsi.png