The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandbox1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Baldy mark (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Appears to be a test edit  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - orphaned and doesn't seem to have clear purpose. Mz7 (talk) 00:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because it only shows some police officers standing at the roadside, presumably waiting for a convoy of nukilar weppons to pass through. This is about as useful as showing the backstage people during a concert when the interesting image would be a band playing on-stage. An appropriate image in this instance would have been of the vehicles in the convoy, with some clear indication that they had nukes on-board and maybe protestors haranguing them. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 00:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete James086^Talk 01:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Huckleberry Hound.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LogoSubcheck (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

It's a non-free file and it's not needed. We already have File:Huckleberry Hound Title Card.jpg to fulfill this function in the Huckleberry Hound article. This image is way too large and high-res for our purposes, and so could easily be used commercially, which violates NFCC #2 as well as the low-res provision of NFCC #3, and there's no countervailing reason as to why we need such a high-quality image. Herostratus (talk) 00:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete because technically the two images are being used on separate but related articles but, the low-res title card image could be used in both articles. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 00:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cabin at Morningside Nature Center, Gainesville, FL.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zeng8r (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

License is CC-BY-NC-SA. —howcheng {chat} 01:01, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Titanic 3D poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wikid77 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file is currently being used on Titanic (1997 film), but there is another film poster in the article infobox (File:Titanic poster.jpg). The file fails NFC criterion 8, because it is located in a subsection which discusses a 3D conversion of the film but omitting this poster would not be detrimental to a readers' understanding of the article topic. It was nominated for speedy deletion but this was contested. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vaibhav upadhyay wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vaibhavupadhyay (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unencyclopedic personal photo. Unsuitable for Commons because it would fail COM:EDUSE. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 21:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:QueenAnnesWarBefore.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Magicpiano (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

As a historian i was chocked to see this map ! That contains no historical accuracy at all! I do not understand how this map was able to pass wikipedia's checking points, it's outrageous, i don't know where to start, maybe the fact the the map is missing about 180 French forts or that the blue areas are completely arbitrary, why are some empty areas in blue and some French forts not in blue ? Why it this little tip of Michigan in blue but not the rest of the now day's state ? Is there any reasons or is it just because the author is just doing whatever he wants ? Why is New Spain colored all the way to it's 1800's boundaries but no forts are shown ? I invite you to check out this map (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f1/NouvelleFrance-Vraie-Version.png/1280px-NouvelleFrance-Vraie-Version.png) which is not the the best map but is FARE better that QueenAnnesWarBefore.svg and a lot more complete and has about 70 verifiable sources not just 3 unverifiable "books". I don't know if we should replace it with this one or just delete the file but we have to do something to correct this. Sincerely HyperSite (talk) 22:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.