The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free logo unless proof is found that copyright has expired. ★ BigrTex 18:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, this file seems to fail c:TOO. It is simply a ((PD-textlogo)) with the wording + the star as a geometric shape. I don't believe the ray behind the star would make this file too original. I've decided to seek other opinions instead of being bold like I normally would. I would like to keep this file, but convert it to ((PD-textlogo)). Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 01:10, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am rather dubious that something as heavily stylized as this would be PD-textlogo. How old is the logo, though? It may meet some other PD-US criteria if it was put in use long enough ago. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:44, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Peter Skewes 2009.png
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Living person, replaceable by free media. MB298 (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:New Disney Cruise Line Boats.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Non-free image being used in decorative manner in Disney Cruise Line#Future. File has a non-free use rationale, but it's claim that "As these ships have not completed construction, the only images that exist of the ships in their completed states are the renderings produced by the Walt Disney Company." does not seem correct. According to the article, four of the six vessels have been completed and are currently in service. Freely licensed images for these ships are being used in the article, so a non-free representation of them is not needed per WP:NFCC#1. Moreover, there is no real need for a non-free image to be used for the two uncompleted vessels per WP:NFCC#8. The reader does not need to see this particular image to understand what is written about these two vessels and the image itself is not particularly the subject of a sourced discussion so the context required by NFCC#8 is lacking. The image is fairly general and there are no real discernible details other than it is an image of six ships, so there no significant information provided by this image about the two new ships that requires it be seen by the reader. Suggest delete since this kind of usage is not really allowed by the WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:New UK Polar Research Vessel Concept Art.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Non-free image of a research vessel under construction being used in Royal Research Ship and RRS Sir David Attenborough. A non-free use rationale is provided for each use, but only the one for "RRS Sir David Attenborough" seems valid because that is a stand-alone article about the vessel itself. "Royal Research Ship" is a general article about these types of ships and the image is being used in a decorative manner in a gallery in Royal Research Ship#Future Royal Research Ships. This kind of usage in galleries is not typically allowed for non-free images per WP:NFG because the context required by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking, which is the case here. Moreover, there is a stand-alone article about the vessel which is wikilinked, so there's no need to use the image here per No. 6 of WP:NFC#UUI. Suggest keep for the article about the vessel itself, but remove from the more general article about this class of vessel. Also, I'm not sure if the template ((Non-free architectural work)) should be being used as the licensing for things such as this since I don't think its common to refer to ships, planes, cars, etc. as "architectural works". There is a ((Non-free aircraft image)) for planes, but there does not seem to be something specific for vessels. Perhaps ((Non-free 2D art)) would be better since this seems to be an artist's rendition of what the vessel will look like upon completion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:06, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As per above. The non-free image should only be used in the stand-alone article about the vessel. Tupsumato (talk) 06:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Starling jon 2009.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete - unused userphoto. Kellyhi! 06:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:BeefyPie.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete - unused personal photo. Kellyhi! 07:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Backpacker card game.gif
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete - unused, derivative of copyrighted material. Kellyhi! 07:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bagot Beast.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete - unused, likely no encyclopedic use. Kellyhi! 07:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Balloonstone.JPG
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Balmoral flag.JPG
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Banbury Town Hall.JPG
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Qazanci bridge.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bantock House Billiards Room.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:34, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Paul Ward, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 09:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Haden Hill Park.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:34, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 09:56, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Broadfield House Permanent Exhibition 3.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 09:57, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Broadfield House Permanent Exhibition 2.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 09:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Broadfield House Permanent Exhibition 1.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 09:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Broadfield House Shop.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 09:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Broadfield House Solid Glass Making.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 09:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bilston Craft Gallery Craftsense Bridge.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bilston Craft Gallery Craftsense Vase.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bilston Craft Gallery Craftsense Glass.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bilston Craft Gallery Stone Circle.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bilston Craft Gallery Dragon Bench.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bilston Craft Gallery Dragon Main.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wednesbury Museum Ruskin Pottery 3.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wednesbury Museum Ruskin Pottery 2.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:04, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wednesbury Museum Ruskin Pottery.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:04, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Walsall Leather Museum Exterior.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Walsall Museum Interior.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Walsall Museum Crocodile Nutcrackers.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Walsall Museum Miniature Locks.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Aaron Hickman, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bantock House Rose Garden.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Paul Ward, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:10, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bantock House Dutch Garden.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Closed as The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Paul Ward, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Wolverhampton Art Gallery Georgian Room.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: The account name suggests this may be a shared account and/or a work for hire situation, but we'd need evidence that the photographer/employer thereof licensed the file; if such is forthcoming please ask for restoration at WP:REFUNDJo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Credited to Paul Ward, but uploader has previously identified as Tom Jenkins on old version of user page. Kellyhi! 10:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Barechested.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Barn 1.JPG
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ BigrTex 17:59, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a barn conversion into a domestic dwelling, possibly UK. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:36, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
May be useful for Commons - the article it was used in was Brassmill (Ross on Wye) which was deleted per PROD. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Was the photo captioned? I'm wondering if it might be this listed building. I also did a search for "barn" among listed buildings in Ross-on-Wye (there are quite a few) but got no hits. Kellyhi! 10:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The caption was Brassmill and the location is Brassmill is situated in 2.8 acres (11,000 m2) of unspoilt rural countryside just North West of Gloucester and east of Ross-on-Wye on the banks of the Ell Brook. The area is ideal for the accessibility to the M50, A40 and M5.. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Barraki Kalmah.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Basevigrave.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:BasharAlAssad.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: WP:SOFTDELETE due to questions about copyright status. Undeletion requests should provide some evidence, preferably.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader unlikely to be photographer. Kellyhi! 13:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep ★ BigrTex 18:00, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not a violation of NFCC10a; the source is indicated (and it's possible the website changed over the past three years), the other information can not always be traced back which is why the policy says where possible. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:PlasmaRedshift Function.png
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Unused image-of-formula that could easily be done in TeX. DMacks (talk) 16:12, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can be done in TeX. Rehman 13:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Plasma Redshift Hubble.png
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Unused image-of-formula that could easily be done in TeX. DMacks (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can be done in TeX. Rehman 13:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Dabur chyawanprash.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Subject of the photo is a copyrighted/unlicensed label czar 16:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unfree label. Rehman 13:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Tbl popSofar.png
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Unused image of text-table that could easily be done in wikitext. And not enough description or sourcing to know what its use-case would be. DMacks (talk) 16:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This would appear to relate to Sri Lanka based on the contributors, history. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:38, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Efscale.jpg
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, per nom. Rehman 12:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+discussion%2F2016+August+23%23File%3APedro+Ortiz+Davila+%28Davilita%29.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
