< January 15	January 17 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. No claim that the uploader's father is deceased, so no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing evidence of permission; no proof that uploader's father has agreed to release the file under the GFDL. FASTILY 06:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussion: Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 16#File:Ayub khan at school.jpg czar 08:22, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: transwiki'd or deleted czar 08:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User appears to be using Wikipedia as a webhost, I would encourage the user to instead upload his images to Google Photos or a similar hosting service instead of hosting unencyclopedic content here. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete mostly unused personal images, clear violations of WP:NOTWEBHOST. -FASTILY 20:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a file hosting service. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 20:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per the previous comments. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:43, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with discretion - Many of these images appear to be either of a former mega-church, and a college named after Cesar Chavez. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DanTD: Could you please make a list of these files? I'd be interested in transferring them to Commons. -FASTILY 04:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you already had the list right here. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 06:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't. Files such as File:With lucy lec andrew parodi temecula california.jpg, File:Andrew parodi graduation lec 2013 western oregon university (2).jpg, and File:Dolores huerta andrew parodi.jpg are obviously not of a mega church or of Ceaser Chavez college. I'm interested in transferring the files of locations you recognized. Could you list those please? Thanks, FASTILY 08:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, File:Andrew parodi graduation lec 2013 western oregon university (2).jpg can obviously be a Western Oregon University pic. I'm going to have to look through a lot of the others, and this applies to the ones that are already in the commons as well. This one could just be added to a category on Marilyn Monroe impersonators, or a reasonable substitute.---------User:DanTD (talk) 17:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This one has the one at the College named after Cesar Chavez, as do two others I've seen here. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 04:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Some needs to be deleted and some can be kept/moved to commons. Mhhossein ^talk 18:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For example, we don't need files such as File:Mikeparodiandkarenparodi.jpg, File:Mrgardenerbackyardview.jpg, File:Mrgardenersshopback.jpg and File:Mrgardenersshop.jpg. --Mhhossein ^talk 18:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The first two I can certainly agree with. The second two may or may not have been on the grounds of that mega church known as the "Living Enrichment Center." If it has nothing to do with that, or any of the other sites he has been know to take pictures of, I'm okay with those going. Basically anything with the letters "lec" in the name is associated with that place, and should be moved to that commons category. The Jensen Arctic Museum images might be worthwhile as well. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 01:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DanTD and Fastily: I think we'd better list those we are sure to delete. --Mhhossein ^talk 06:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer a complete list of files which are useful, so I can feed it directly into my transfer tool. This would also have the added benefit of making the closing admin's job much easier as well -FASTILY 09:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, so far I've been sticking categories on the ones I know are useful. I did swipe the list and put it on a text file, but it came out with a ton of code, that I'm going to have a hard time sorting out. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Last call to create a list of the images to keep & transfer
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 09:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Am I really the only person who has been working on this? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 14:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would anyone mind as I add files as I go along? It's not as easy to sort everything out. Below are images for Colegio Cesar Chavez. I'll expand that and make new lists for the Living Enrichment Center, anything else that could be kept.---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images of Cesar Chavez College

Images of the Living Enrichment Center

This one (File:Andrew parodi with lec Janet Eilber at Arlene Schnitzher Concert hall Portland Oregon.jpg), you can add to either Martha Graham and/or Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall. I'm not sure if there's a category for Marilyn Monroe impersonators. Also, I just added cats for images at Western Oregon University and the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images of Western Oregon University

File:Andrew parodi graduation lec 2013 western oregon university (2).jpg ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images of Oregon Museum of Science and Industry

File:Andrew parodi einstein oregon museum of science and industry omsi lec.jpg ---------User:DanTD (talk) 16:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The uncontested file nominations have been deleted; the only ones are DanTD's files
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus & @DanTD: Thanks to you both. I'll work on moving the remaining files to Commons :) -FASTILY 04:27, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, although I did forget to add File:Jensen Arctic Museum employee Andrew Parodi with elk lec.jpg to the Jensen Arctic Museum, although one above this might've been something worth saving for that. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 04:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved all the remaining files to Commons. There were a few with FOP issues, but I've nominated those for deletion separately. This mass nom can probably be closed now. -FASTILY 07:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, all. Quick note that it would be worth categorizing the articles on Commons now, since they're bound to be left uncategorized and lost without any sign of how they're connected to each other. @DanTD czar 08:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image appears elsewhere in higher resolution, e.g http://www.poptower.com/roger-allam-picture-49598.htm, and there is no indication that the uploader is the copyright holder or that the image is freely licensed Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as copyvio Amisom (talk) 14:38, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Fair use rationale added -FASTILY 08:47, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BigrTex closed the previous discussion as "delete", but the file was not deleted and now has a mangled license Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why it did not get deleted at the time, but when it was nominated today, it was in the same state as it was when I closed the previous discussion. ★ Bigr Tex 16:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as fair use. I was about to enact the previous closure but the sculpture is the subject of its own article... so the statue image is the best visualization of the subject. Fair use needed, as the sculpture is copyrighted. This said, the sculpture may not be independently notable, in which case it'd be deleted as unused fair use. czar 23:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Czar, this is replaceable (still exists and can be photographed by the public), so it can't be used under non-free use. Fails WP:NFCC#1. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13, not sure what you mean. The photo is already free use—the issue is the statue's copyright, which won't change if someone else from the public photographs it. And it's not replaceable as it's used to identify the subject of the WP page, which is the statue itself. Not sure how it can get freer without the sculptor releasing their license. czar 19:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: Wow, did I have a stupid moment. You're absolutely correct. Not sure what on earth I was thinking when I wrote that ... ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 19:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added the fair use rationale myself so if there are no objections, this can be closed now (thus finally wrapping up our months-long backlog!) czar 07:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Sphilbrick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An image without an explanation and no foreseeable encyclopedic use. This image is, at best, cute. Codename Lisa (talk) 11:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As stated here, it appears to be an image of Arginase. May be worth moving to Commons thus. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A superior version is already available on Commons, under the same name. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nondescript low-resolution image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: History split overwritten file to File:Loomis 1.jpg. Tagged remaining file as no license. -FASTILY 06:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file consists of two revisions showing two entirely different things. The trouble is, the latest revision has no description, source, or licensing information. (The image description page was not updated when it was uploaded.) Hence, I believe this revision is eligible for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#F4. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 08:22, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second fair use image of cover. This one is not critically discussed at all. Violates WP:NFCCP #3a and #8. Majora (talk) 19:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uh why would you randomly remove the record store day artwork that 99% of people won't know exists without this wiki page. I see plenty of other songs that have multiple covers uploaded that arent "critically discussed" BlaccCrab (talk) 21:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BlaccCrab: If there are two fair used covers on an article and the alternate is not critically discussed it should be deleted. If you find such things please nominate them for deletion. Just because others break policy doesn't mean you should. Our policy is quite clear on this matter. Sorry. --Majora (talk) 04:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No one else cares and it spruces the page up but alright my dude, have it your way. BlaccCrab (talk) 04:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No one else cares is not a valid reason to violate both our fair use policy and copyright. It isn't "my way". It is Wikipedia policy. Period. --Majora (talk) 04:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 26#File:WernerHerrmann.jpg))

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable company logo, no educational use for Commons czar 20:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map of country settings in video game, unlikely to have future educational use czar 21:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map of country settings in video game, unlikely to have future educational use czar 21:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not completely sure what the description signifies but it looks like this image was either directly ripped or is derivative of a copyrighted game character design without permission of the character design's copyright holder czar 21:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of copyrighted artwork without permission of copyright holder czar 21:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Empty pixel object used as a spacer in old table drafts. Can be solved with coded spacing now, so no encyclopedic use. czar 21:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what to do with this one. If it's a useful illustration, it needs a license for its Linux text (and some confirmation of the uploader as photographer?) If it's not a useful illustration, it should be deleted. czar 21:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free video game screenshot (no permission from game's copyright holder). Other screenshot from the article (SimSig) has a fair use rationale. Delete if it has no rationale or permission of the copyright holder. czar 21:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-res logo, no potential future encyclopedic use czar 21:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn czar 22:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Failed license review. Went to linked site but there was no mention of a Creative Commons license there. czar 21:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: It's in an HTML comment:

<!-- Screen Shots licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike -->

Doodle77 (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. E-Kartoffel (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear authorship. Image quality relatively low, considering other photos of computer mice. czar 22:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is the subject of the photo, so we either need WP:OTRS confirmation that the photographer transferred copyright to the uploader or confirmation that the uploader took the photo himself. czar 22:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Subject of photo is copyrighted box artwork czar 22:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See uploader's talk page: Missing confirmation whether the uploader created the game (environment artist) or just took the screenshot. czar 22:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Web-sized image unlikely to be own work, based on uploader's other uploads. czar 23:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Web-sized photo unlikely to be own work, based on uploader's other uploads. czar 23:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Czar (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of non-notable game. GFDL license needs confirmation. Unlikely to have future encyclopedic use. czar 23:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is my screenshot. The article "Swords of Chaos" has been deleted like 5 years ago because it doesn't had enough notoriety. I thought the images linked in it would have been deleted as well. Just delete that image and move on. Zurd (talk) 04:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

January 16

File:Ayub khan at school.jpg

Uploads by User:Andrew Parodi

File:Roger Allam.jpg

File:Stone Dog II (Forest Park, Springfield, MA).jpeg

File:Fullsize.jpg

File:Heat Pipe Mechanism.svg

File:Lonato.jpg

File:Loomis.jpg

File:Broccoli (feat. Lil Yachty) - Single.jpg

File:WernerHerrmann.jpg

File:VXLO0002.JPG

File:Carmenworld2ndedition.PNG

File:Carmenworld3rdedition.PNG

File:Illustration 22.jpg

File:Imabisou remote play.png

File:Invis flag.png

File:Yellow Dog Linux booting up.jpg

File:KX Simsig.png

File:Kingdoms of Amalur - Reckoning.jpg

File:Knytt.png

File:Felix Kersting RED ONE.jpg

File:Logitech G9x.jpg

File:Madfiddler 01.jpg

File:Mario no Photopi, Smart Media, cards.jpg

File:Tume.png

File:The Ant Commandos, Corporate HQ.gif

File:Flyingv.jpg

File:Swordsofchaos.png