< September 21 September 23 >

September 22

File:John Allen Williams.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Allen Williams.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by T.Whetsell (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This looks to be a professional photograph. Could the uploader please confirm that he is indeed the photographer and explain? Thanks. Themightyquill (talk) 07:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Morris Janowitz1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morris Janowitz1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by T.Whetsell (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image appears to be a professional photograph. Could the uploader please confirm that he/she is the photographer and explain? Thanks. Themightyquill (talk) 07:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Korean Army K1A1 tank.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Korean Army K1A1 tank.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sriram (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Was deleted on Commons saying the license release wasn't valid. See c:File:Korean_Army_K1A1_tank.jpg. Orphaned as well. ~ Rob13Talk 11:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KhardungLa4A.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:KhardungLa4A.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Viewfinder (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Was marked as not Commons by a third party, but no further details provided. I am in good faith reasoning that the named photographer is the uploader. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ghedi-Stemma.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghedi-Stemma.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Marked as unsuitable for Commons due to licensing issues, what licensing issues? If this is free it should be on Commons, If non-free under fair use as image is clearly in use in an article. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IC Macroglossum stellatarum1.JPG bg-blurred.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:IC Macroglossum stellatarum1.JPG bg-blurred.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by H (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Marked as unsuitable for Commons by a third party, but I am failing to see why as the image this is derived from is on Commons without issue. The person requesting no commons on this did not provide any other reasoning apparently. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Canada goose flight cropped.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canada goose flight cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pharaoh Hound (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image from which this is derived is at Commons without issue, so I am failing to see why a ((Do not move to Commons)) is applicable. The third party placing the tag did not provide any additional reasoning. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pingyaocannon.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pingyaocannon.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tomtom08 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Who actually took the photo? This image is claimed to be joint copyright of the named parties. If both then OTRS may be needed from the other party, as there is an absence of evidence of permission on this file currently. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logitech MX-510 Blue.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logitech MX-510 Blue.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NatalyaAF (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Marked as unsuitable for Commons, but not seeing why this is so as no additional detail was provided by the tagger. The concern I would have is do do with whats shown is entirely functional or has third party elements of industrial design. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NGS Honorable Mention Award to THFFI.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. I hate doing this, but the fact that you own and received an image does not entail you received copyright to it. You'd need to ask the NGS that they license the image under say CC-BY-SA. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGS Honorable Mention Award to THFFI.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cochituate (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious authorship claim. This seems to have been created by the National Genealogical Society and not by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 19:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief. I scanned the certificate. I am the Treasurer of The Hungerford Family Foundation, Inc. and the editor of "The Hungerford World Tree." I attended the NGS Conference where this certificate was awarded to us. Charlie (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly go to this link for verification of the authenticity of this certificate. Yes, the certificate was created by the NGS but it was awarded to THFFI. I am the "author" of the image since I scanned the certificate that was handed to me and remains in my possession. Here is the link showing the award to THFFI: https://www.ngsgenealogy.org/cs/awards_winners Charlie (talk) 20:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:20th Century Fox World (Malaysia) concept art.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:20th Century Fox World (Malaysia) concept art.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Elisfkc (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#8, there is no specific commentary regarding this image. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Attila About That Life alternate cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Attila About That Life alternate cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AlexisSurge66 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Very similar to standard edition and not discussed critically. Fails NFUR. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Opeth-ghost-reveries.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opeth-ghost-reveries.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Scarter2000 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Virtually identical to standard cover. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Opeth Ghost Special.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opeth Ghost Special.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Doomsdayer520 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails NFUR, not discussed critically or used educationally. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheSoundOfPerseverance2011.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheSoundOfPerseverance2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lambofgodmaggot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Virtually identical to standard cover. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.