- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted (not kept, sorry). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of missing citations, poor layout, giant tables in the body, wicked excessive images, a far too detailed accidents section that fails to use any discretion... this is not a GA in its present state and is actually painful to try and read with all the clutter. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- HJ Mitchell was questioning the GA status of this article in 2012! Delist. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't even make it to the talk page before deciding this was a clear GAR candidate, that just makes it even worse! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Unsourced paragraphs and lists are a real problem. Also has a few maintenance tags that are several years old. Phlsph7 (talk) 20:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.