- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
- Result: no improvement; delisted ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Uncited sections, short lede that needs expansion. Z1720 (talk) 02:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- It looks like the article quality may have declined since the GA nom, so we could revert backwards a bit. Is the 2008 new-GA version better than the current version? It certainly looks better on a quick read. 2018 may be a possibility as well. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @The ed17: The 2008 version uses a source called angelfire.com. Do you know what that is? This article might need to merge the 2008 version with the 2023 version. Z1720 (talk) 16:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Oof, that's why I specified a quick read. Angelfire was a place where anyone could make a webpage. To some of the other sources, thehistoryofwwe.com has at least been questioned per this discussion, although I'm seeing RSs cite it via Google Books... same goes for Kayfabe Memories and being cited in RSs via Google Books. I'm not the original nominator nor an expert here (I found this by having User talk:Bellhalla on my watchlist), so I'm going to post to WP:WWE to see if anyone wants to carry this forward. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.